Plant Trees SF Events 2005 Archive: 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Event

 
Drug dogs curbed by state supreme court after US supreme court let

                                 dogs out




Florida's Supreme Court let stand restrictions on drug dogs, after  the U.S.

Supreme Court loosened leashes. http://rexcurry.net/drugdogsmain.html

The nation's top court let cops take dogs fishing for drugs in

Illinois v Caballes.  Florida allows other avenues for relief in

Florida v Matheson http://rexcurry.net/drugdogsflorida.pdf (3-3-05)

and the very libertarian decision at

http://rexcurry.net/drugdogs2dca.pdf (the appellate case below). I am

the attorney who argued the original motion to suppress for Matheson.




Drug dogs are covers for lies.  Here's how -




1.  Cops tell drivers that they should consent to a search of their

car because radio dispatch "has a drug dog on the way over."  It is

often a lie told to induce drivers to consent to search.  There is no

dog on the way.




2.  If a dog is or is not "on the way," cops add additional lies to

make drivers think that there will be a long wait and that the driver

must stay until a dog arrives.  Cops rely on driver ignorance of the

fact that evidence will be suppressed if drivers are detained longer

than it takes to complete the traffic stop (e.g. write the ticket).

Drivers are induced to consent to search to avoid a long wait based on

lies.




3. If a dog is enroute, cops let drivers think that they are obliged

to stay even when the cop has no reason to detain drivers any longer.

The cop's rationalization is that drivers loiter roadside with cops

for no apparent reason or because drivers enjoy waiting for dog

sniffs. Cops take advantage of drivers who are too stupid (or too

meek) to ask if they are free to go, so that drivers "consent" to

unwarranted detention by not leaving.




4.  Cops lie about how long it is taking to write a ticket or to

obtain a radio response on a driver's license or tag check.  If a dog

is actually on the way, the cops will make sure that the ticket is

written very slowly, until the dog arrives.




5.  After the dog arrives, cops will lie and say that the dog alerted,

even if it didn't.   In that sense, it doesn't matter whether or not

dogs are well-trained or accurate, because dogs are often ruses for

lies to violate constitutional rights.




6. If a dog alerts and nothing is found, then cops will never record

that as an error, but will claim that the dog detected lingering odors

of contraband that were recently present.  Cops will testify that dogs

never make mistakes, never have and never will, and that apparent

errors are skillful detections of lingering (residual) odors of

contraband.




Government's attitude toward your liberty is like a dog at a fire

hydrant.




It is a reminder of the police-state tactics in the infamous Goose

Creek videotape of the government school in South Carolina where

children were forced to the floor in handcuffs and terrorized by dogs

and cops with guns drawn.  Nothing was found.




In other government schools, classes have been interrupted and the

children were marched out and lined up to be harassed by a dog.




yours in liberty,




Rex Curry

Attorney At Law
For updates and info, contact scott at planttrees dot org.