Plant Trees SF Events 2024 Archive: 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Event

 
– Government war on family farming via inheritance tax. Liz Webster, from Save British Farming, on inheritance tax and farmland used as a tax dodge,
– Keir Starmer squirms as major error in farming tax exposed at Liaison Committee
– Rachel Reeves: Bringing You the Financial Crash Revival Tour, 2024. About to Deliver the Sequel to Gordon Brown’s Pre-2008 Deregulation Disaster?
– The crimes of Peter Mandelson 1 Hinduja passports (1997 & 2001); 2 coup plotter Ely Calil (2004); 3 Rothschild-Deripaska in Corfu (2012); 4 Epstein (2019);
– UK water privatisation poison 1: Southern Water cut off, and they are going to raise prices. Southern Water outage: More than 58,000 homes could be without water
– UK water privatisation poison 2: Check how much YOUR water bill is going up by as bosses green light huge hikes of 36%- with some locations facing a 53% rise PLUS inflation
– Elon Musk and Sam Altman’s ‘Open AI’ whistleblower Suchir Balaji is found dead after making damning claims about copyright theft by the company.
– Dominic Cummings: is AI already running governments? Rigidly controlled, robotic, ossified, UK civil service
– The Accelerationists’ War on God, Nietzschen Dark Enlightenment, infesting our universities 1: ‘Accelerate or Die’ documentary on Sky Arts. Jake Chapman’s
– The Accelerationists’ War on God, Nietzschen Dark Enlightenment, infesting our universities 2: Jules Evans on offshore living of libertarians and Nick Land.
– The Accelerationists’ War on God, Nietzschen Dark Enlightenment, infesting our universities 3: Accelerationism, amphetamine philosophy, and the Death Trip
– The Accelerationists’ War on God, Nietzschen Dark Enlightenment, infesting our universities 4: Nietzsche and the Nazis famous for his statement “God is dead”
– The Accelerationists’ War on God, Nietzschen Dark Enlightenment, infesting our universities 5: Ayn Rand’s role in rehabilitating Nietzsche post Adolf Hitler
– The Accelerationists’ War on God, Nietzschen Dark Enlightenment, infesting our universities 6: Nazis on Acid: Psychedelics & Fascism: MK-Ultra and Silicon Valley
– Jeff Wayne’s 1978 War of the Worlds ‘rock opera’. Science fiction pioneer, and Fabian, H.G. Wells was from Bromley, Kent (like Tony).
– HG Wells mural removed by Bromley council and replaced with one of notorious atheist fraudster Charles Darwin who was not from Bromley
– Orwell and Wells, It is clear, then, that the two writers had legitimate positions on how to counter tyranny and injustice but why does Orwell seek to attack and ultimately destroy the older man’s political credibility?
– NATO assassinates Russian General who exposed Pentagon’s biolabs in Ukraine, Igor Kirillov, in Moscow street
– Hamish de Bretton-Gordon & MI6 is PRIME SUSPECT in this WWIII provocation which was cynically carried out before Trump takes office and a potential Russia Ukraine peace
– Russia is now considering assassination of NATO officials, after a series of what it believes to be NATO-aided assassinations of senior Russian military figures – says former Russian president Medvedev
– Russian general Kirillov assassination by MI6/NATO/Ukraine – also Mikhail Shatsky, Sergei Yevsyukov, Illia Kyva, Stanislav Rzhitsky, Zakhar Prilepin, Vladlen Tatarsky, Darya Dugina
– Newest NATO member Finland finds out NATO is at war with neighbouring Russia from ex-MI6 DG and Bilderberger, Richard Dearlove, on Sky News!
– Putin press conference: I think that we have moved back from the edge of the abyss, everything that happened to Russia was leading us to a complete and total loss of our sovereignty
– BBC article on new Syrian leader. From Syrian jihadist leader to rebel politician: How Abu Mohammed al-Jolani reinvented himself
– Alex Krainer, The Naked Hedgie, false flag nuclear attack by West (on London?) as they lose wars? Russia’s Secret Trap in Syria? Dialogue Works
– Weaponisation of the pro-genocide UK police against peaceful UK non-violent direct activists and journalists Press TV at journalist event.
– Former shadow chancellor John McDonnell MP on Gaza horrors and political failure. IDF attacking churches and UK politics broken, police powers abused
– Orthodox church in Ukraine is being Nazified – Orthodox Church in Ukraine is being completely taken apart, yet world turns blind eye – Putin
– King Charles decides on war & peace, Charles is a senior Zionist and Islamic leader but abusing Gaza genocide to gain power?
– Why has King Charles, who appoints army officers, civil servants, judges and all UK officials supporting Israel’s genocide in Gaza, been silent on the genocide?
– Antidepressants are making ‘patients’ suicidal and homicidal. Katinka Blackford-Newman nearly died because of a common side-effect of antidepressant.
– Little Imber on the down, seven miles from any town! Gordon Lewis’ exposes WWII mistake and cover-up and a mass trespass in 1961 which attempted to reclaim it
– Who was the Shoplifting Vicar? Rev. John Papworth preached, to his congregation, that it was okay to steal from supermarkets if you were poor and hungry
– NOT The BCfm Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling

https://politicsthisweek.wordpress.com/2024/12/19/not-the-bcfm-politics-show-presented-by-tony-gosling-221/

Part One – Local and National News Review

Emacs! fe090fdf.jpg
Government war on family farming via inheritance tax. Liz Webster, from Save British Farming, on inheritance tax and farmland used as a tax dodge, and her reasoning on why policy won’t work. Relieve pressure on farmers by raising threshold for farm inheritance tax, Bishop urges The shadow cabinet gather outside parliament on Tuesday to protest against the Government plan to increase by 20 per cent inheritance tax on farms worth more than £1 million THE threshold for inheritance tax levied on farms should be raised, in order to alleviate the pressure that the Government’s proposals are putting on farmers, the Bishop of Norwich, the Rt Revd Graham Usher, has said. In a debate in the House of Lords last week, Bishop Usher said that the Government’s proposals were bringing “huge stress and deep concern to the farming community”. New rules, due to come into force in April 2026, will mean that inheritance tax of 20 per cent is applied on farms worth more than £1 million. Previously, agricultural assets have been exempt from inheritance tax. Bishop Usher said that the proposals were, for many farmers, the “final straw after years of challenges.” He urged the Government to raise the threshold at which inheritance tax is levied, so that it applied only to the largest farming estates. He also argued for a “tweak” to the rules around tax-free gifts in the seven years before a person’s death, “so that farm owners who die in the next seven years have an opportunity to make tax-avoiding gifts in light of the Budget changes”. This, he said, would be an “eminently sensible and compassionate” way forward. The breakup or sale of smaller farms to pay tax bills was likely to affect biodiversity, he said. The Bishop of Newcastle, Dr Helen-Ann Hartley ­ whose diocese, like Bishop Usher’s, consists in large part of farming communities ­ also spoke against the Government’s proposals. “I urge the Government to truly consider the impact of these reforms and encourage them to have continued dialogue and an assessment of the impact on farming families and rural communities the people to whom we owe the food on our tables,” she said. The debate was called by the Earl of Leicester, a hereditary peer who sits as a Conservative. He said that it was wrong to tax farmers as if agricultural property was personal wealth, “instead of what it really is ­ a business asset”. Baroness Mallalieu, who is a Labour peer as well as president of the Countryside Alliance and a small livestock farmer, also criticised the policy. “I believe the Government know that they have got this one wrong,” she said. She called for a change of plan. The only other Labour peer to speak in the debate was the Financial Secretary to the Treasury, Lord Livermore. He was also the only contributor to speak in defence of the proposals, suggesting that they were necessary in order to achieve economic stability. The inheritance tax, he said, was to be levied at half the usual rate on assets worth more than £1 million, and about three-quarters of estates were not expected to face any increase in their tax burden under the new rules.

fe09100d.jpg
Keir Starmer squirms as major error in farming tax exposed at Liaison Committee The Prime Minister sat down for his first grilling by the senior Commons Liaison Committee. Sir Keir Starmer was left squirming at the Liaison Committee this afternoon when he was asked simple questions about his planned changes to inheritance tax for farmers. After weeks of furious protests, the Prime Minister appeared unaware that his figure of only 500 estates being affected by the changes does not account for situations where farming land is passed down using business property relief. The PM said he believes the 500 figure to be robust, only for senior MP Alister Carmichael to shoot him down and point out: “I can assure you that it doesn’t”. Sir Keir appeared robotic when Mr Carmichael recounted a recent case of a farmer breaking down in tears in front of his committee over the tractor tax impact. Today’s 90-minute Liaison Committee session is focusing on growth and the economy; public services and plan for change; and global affairs and security. Starmer squirms over changes to inheritance tax for farmers and family businesses Starmer has insisted that his changes to APR and BPR get the balance right between raising revenue and protecting family farms. Asked if he is happy with the super rich getting away from the new taxes largely unscathed, while small family farms face the prospect of having to sell up, Sir Keir insisted that what the rich do with their money, provided it’s within the rules, is ‘up to them’. Asked how many family farms will be caught by the new tax, Sir Keir insists that the Treasury figure of 500 is a ‘robust’ estimation. However the PM stumbled when it was pointed out that the 500 figure doesn’t include farming estates where the land was passed on using BPR. Sir Keir replied “I think that it does”, however DEFRA committee chair Alistair Carmichael informed the PM: “I can assure you that it doesn’t”. Mr Carmichael accused Rachel Reeves of having refused to meet with farming unions since the Budget.

fe09103c.jpg
Rachel Reeves on inflation and Waspi women. Rachel Reeves: Bringing You the Financial Crash Revival Tour, 2024 Is Rachel Reeves About to Deliver the Sequel to Gordon Brown’s Pre-2008 Deregulation Disaster? Just as the dust finally settles from the 2008 financial apocalypse, Rachel Reeves has announced her brilliant idea to cut down on that pesky “red tape” choking our financial sector. But hang on­haven’t we heard this tune before? It sounds suspiciously like Gordon Brown’s late-90s anthem of “light-touch regulation,” which, if memory serves, wasn’t exactly the roaring success it seemed to be at the time. Brown’s pre-2008 masterpiece of deregulation let the financial wizards run wild with dodgy loans, mortgage-backed misadventures, and credit-default sorcery, all of which ultimately crashed with the grace of a cow on ice. So, is Reeves really suggesting we reenact this economic farce? Why Are We Reviving the Very Red Tape That Once Held the Economy Together? Reeves seems to think that “red tape” is little more than a nuisance, an annoying hindrance preventing bankers from unleashing their true creative potential. But let’s recall what this “tape” was actually holding together: the basic, sanity-saving boundaries that prevented financial firms from turning our economy into their personal casino. In the pre-2008 free-for-all, everyone from London to Las Vegas seemed to forget that risks are best enjoyed in moderation. Now, Reeves seems intent on reviving those carefree, heady days, leaving us to wonder if her real ambition is to bring back the financial crash revival tour, complete with a sold-out performance in the UK. Should We Really Be Giving the Green Light to Less Accountability? One of Reeves’ “innovative” ideas is to ease up on the Senior Managers and Certification Regime, which was put in place after 2008 to make sure financial executives couldn’t simply shrug their shoulders and bolt when their risky strategies blew up. In short, she’s suggesting we make it easier for these financial honchos to dodge accountability, as if it wasn’t already hard enough to pin down a banker who suddenly “can’t recall” who approved that toxic loan package. Remember, Gordon Brown’s “light-touch regulation” essentially meant “trust the bankers to keep it in check.” And we all know how well that worked out. Yet Reeves appears to be asking, what’s the worst that could happen if we loosen things up a little more? Oh, nothing much­just the collapse of several major banks, a taxpayer-funded bailout, and maybe a housing crisis for old time’s sake. Who Actually Thinks “More Risk” Is the Solution to Economic Stability? Reeves has declared that she’s had quite enough of all this “risk aversion” and is determined to bring a bit of edge back into the economy. Apparently, the idea is that if we just inject a bit of extra risk, bankers will finally have the freedom to innovate! But isn’t that exactly what got us into trouble before? Back in the days when Gordon Brown was too busy polishing the reputation of London as the “world’s financial capital” to worry about what might be lurking beneath, bankers took risks with gusto, building towers of debt that toppled faster than a reality star’s PR career. Reeves seems to think “risk” is a magic ingredient that will make our economy more dynamic. But let’s not forget, “risk” in financial jargon is often just a polite word for “gambling with other people’s money.” And when things go south, we know exactly who’s left footing the bill. Are We Really Going to Reopen the Subprime Mortgage Playbook? For those of us who remember the horror show of the last crash, the phrase “subprime mortgage” is about as welcome as an unsinkable Titanic replica. Yet Reeves’ deregulatory plans pave the way for precisely this sort of financial wizardry to make its grand return. With fewer regulations, we can practically expect the banks to jump right back into high-risk loans, collateralized debt obligations, and other Wall Street Frankenstein creations that nearly vaporized the global economy last time. Are we seriously going to relive the days when banks handed out mortgages to anyone with a pulse, or in some cases, a well-trained pet? Reeves might dress it up as a path to economic dynamism, but we all know where this road leads­and it isn’t toward prosperity. Will Reeves’ “Pro-Growth” Package Turn Out to Be a Pro-Banker Package? At its core, Reeves’ pro-growth agenda sounds like a greatest-hits album of financial deregulation, just like the one Gordon Brown once released with disastrous reviews. She wants to unshackle financial managers, reduce their “burdensome” accountability, and encourage banks to ramp up their risk-taking, all in the name of growth. But if history has taught us anything, it’s that this isn’t so much a pro-growth strategy as it is a pro-banker one, offering more freedom for a select few at the expense of everyone else. So, are we all just supposed to cross our fingers and hope that this time will be different? That the bankers who nearly imploded the global economy in 2008 have now become financial saints, somehow immune to the lure of reckless profits? What Will Be Left for the Taxpayer to Bail Out This Time? Let’s face it: Reeves’ deregulatory fever dream sounds like a direct line to a very familiar economic disaster. Gordon Brown’s deregulation left the nation scrambling to patch up a sinking financial ship, with the taxpayer picking up the tab. And now Reeves seems determined to steer us straight back to the same iceberg. So, if history is any guide, all we can do is sit back, prepare our wallets, and brace for another round of bank bailouts, economic “stimulus packages,” and mortgage meltdowns.

fe09105b.jpg

City of London and King Charles’ new UK ambassador to Washington. The brazen serpent: crimes of Peter Mandelson 1 Hinduja passports (1997 & 2001); 2 coup plotter Ely Calil (2004); 3 Rothschild/Deripaska in Corfu (2012); 4 Epstein (2019); Lord Mandelson, the Rothschild pal and Mossad-friendly ‘Prince of Darkness’, describes what he thinks of Trump: ‘racist’, ‘dangerous’… Who is Peter Mandelson? King Charles’ US ambassador pick? He’s an anti-Brexit advocate for closer China ties ­ but could Peter Mandelson charm Trumpworld? LONDON ­ Peter Mandelson looks set for a new life in the United States after a long and sometimes-controversial career in British public life. After much speculation, an announcement confirming him as the government’s choice for next U.K. ambassador to Washington came from No.10 Downing Street late Friday. It’s a remarkable next chapter for Mandelson, who is staunchly anti-Brexit and supports more cooperation with China. Those factors alone could make him a tough sell in Donald Trump’s Washington. Yet his political savvy, deep trade experience and outsize character are all being talked up as assets when it comes to dealing with the U.S. president-elect and his team. As rumors swirled about Mandelson’s potential appointment last month, POLITICO spoke to key figures on both sides of the Atlantic to find out how a Labour veteran might fare with the Make America Great Again crowd. Establishment operator A savvy political operator who helped return the center-left Labour Party to power in the 1990s, Mandelson is firmly part of the British political establishment, with a seat in the House of Lords, the upper chamber of the British parliament. After helping new Prime Minister Keir Starmer enter Downing Street last summer, ending another long stretch in in the cold for the party, the former Cabinet minister in Tony Blair’s government is now set to succeed Karen Pierce ­ current inhabitant of the lavish ambassador’s residence in the exclusive Embassy Row enclave in the north west of the city. A bête noire of the Labour left, the pro-business and well-connected Mandelson has had a storied career so far ­ and he’s no stranger to the headlines. Mandelson was forced to resign twice from government over scandals and has a reputation for saccharine politeness in public but ruthless political maneuvering behind the scenes, winning him the nickname “the Prince of Darkness.” Despite his media prowess ­ he is known in Westminster for taking acerbic tones with reporters who cross him. In 2023 Mandelson’s past links with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, who referred to him as “Petie,” were revealed. And a similarly close relationship with the Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska caused him headaches when it was revealed in 2008, as have other dealings with the global super rich. But it’s Mandelson’s views on Europe, China and trade that could make his anticipated new role courting the Trump administration in Washington a tricky one. For a start, Donald Trump enthusiastically backed Brexit. Peter Mandelson did not. The Labour peer sat on the board of the official Remain campaign during the EU referendum in 2016, then advocated for a second referendum to overturn the decision after Brexit won. He understands well how the political institutions in Brussels work, having served as a European Commissioner for trade between 2005 and 2008, and having covered the trade role in government beforehand.

fe090fb0.jpg
UK water privatisation poison 1: Southern Water cut off, and they are going to raise prices. Southern Water outage: More than 58,000 homes could be without water until the weekend amid ‘technical issue’ at supply works Tens of thousands of homes could be without water until the weekend because of a ‘technical issue’ at a Southern Water supply works. Almost 60,000 homes across Hampshire – in Southampton, Romsey, Eastleigh, Totton, and parts of the New Forest – have low pressure or no water at all. Southern Water said it is ‘so sorry’ and said that problems at the Testwood water supply works are preventing water from leaving the site. Long queues of cars could be seen causing congestion in the streets near bottle stations, while some had walked for up to three miles to collect their allocation of water. The company said it is delivering water supplies to customers registered on its priority list, along with to Southampton General Hospital and Princess Anne Hospital. It said this morning that its teams have ‘fixed the problem’ and are filling up the reservoir – but it is a ‘gradual process’ meaning homes may not have access to water until the weekend. Yesterday the supplier said the problem is affecting a total of 10 postcodes – SO15, S016, SO40, SO42, SO43, SO45, SO50, SO51, SO52 and SO53. It comes as households were warned about massive bill hikes averaging £31 a year – with Southern Water customers are being hit hardest with bills going up 53 per cent.

fe0910a9.jpg

UK water privatisation poison 2: Check how much YOUR water bill is going up by as bosses green light huge hikes of 36%- with some locations facing a 53% rise PLUS inflation Water bosses were today given the green light for huge bill hikes averaging 36 per cent over the next five years. An eye-watering round of increases has been announced by regulator Ofwat, despite fury at the performance of operators. Southern Water customers are being hit hardest with bills going up 53 per cent over the period – and inflation projected to add another 10 per cent. Severn Trent customers must brace for 47 per cent rises, two Welsh firms 42 per cent and Yorkshire Water 41 per cent. Thames Water, which has been paying bonuses to executives despite being in the grip of a funding crisis, has been allowed a 35 per cent increase. The bill rises for England and Wales – averaging £31 a year – would begin to take effect from April next year. The move comes at a time of public outrage over pollution in rivers, huge salaries paid to water company bosses and massive dividends taken by shareholders. Just this week the Office for Environmental Protection ruled that water companies should have had no excuse to tip sewage as the law has been clear that it is illegal since at least 1994 – but the Department for Environment, the Environment Agency and Ofwat failed to enforce the law. Between 2021 and 2023 alone water companies paid £2.5billion in dividends and added £8.2billion to their net debt. Ofwat has been engaged in intense negotiations with water companies over the scale of the rises. The watchdog originally knocked back demands for hikes of more than 21 per cent over five years. But extraordinarily companies responded by asking for even more. They wanted the average consumer bill in England and Wales rise by 40 per cent between now and 2030 – costing £615 per year. Those proposals would have seen Southern Water customers hammered with an 84 per cent increase over the period. Campaigners and politicians have slammed the companies for ‘greed’, saying they were ‘sucking the dregs’ out of customers. The Lib Dems called for Ofwat to be abolished.

fe0910c9.jpg

Elon Musk and Sam Altman’s ‘Open AI’ whistleblower found dead  Mystery as Open AI whistleblower Suchir Balaji is found dead in San Francisco home A former OpenAI researcher turned whistleblower was found dead in his San Francisco just months after making damning claims about the company. Suchir Balaji, 26, was found dead on November 26, three months after he accused the company of violating copyright laws in their development of ChatGPT. Mercury News reported that there was no foul play determined in the circumstances of his death which has been ruled a suicide. San Francisco Police Officers were called to the home to conduct a wellness check when they found him. Balaji had been a researcher for the artificial intelligence research company for four years after joining in 2020.. After the AI system was released in 2022, Balaji began to question if the data that was gathered was an infringement on copyright. In August, he left OpenAI because he ‘no longer wanted to contribute to technologies that he believed would bring society more harm than benefit,’ reported the New York Times. ‘If you believe what I believe, you have to just leave the company,’ he told the outlet. Over the past two years, companies like OpenAI have been sued by various individuals and businesses for claims on their copyrighted material. His role and knowledge in legal proceedings against the company was considered ‘crucial.’ The New York Times was involved in their own lawsuit against OpenAI and its primary partner, Microsoft, who both denied claims that they had used millions of published articles to inform the intelligence and began competing with the outlet as a result. On November 18, the outlet filed a letter in federal court that named Balaji as a person with ‘unique and relevant documents’ that would be used in their litigation against Open AI. Their suit said: ‘Microsoft and OpenAI simply take the work product of reporters, journalists, editorial writers, editors and others who contribute to the work of local newspapers – all without any regard for the efforts, much less the legal rights, of those who create and publish the news on which local communities rely. Whilst other researchers have warned of potential future risks of the technology, such as becoming a danger to humanity, Balaji told the Times that he believes the risk to be far more ‘immediate’ than feared. 

fe0910e8.jpg
He added: ‘I thought that AI was a thing that could be used to solve unsolvable problems, like curing diseases and stopping aging. I thought we could invent some kind of scientist that could help solve them.’ Balaji said that he believed the threats posed by chatbots, such as ChatGPT, were destroying the commercial viability of the individuals, businesses and internet services that created the digital data used to train such systems. ‘This is not a sustainable model for the internet ecosystem as a whole,’ he said. While OpenAI, Microsoft and other companies have claimed their use of internet data to train the technology falls under ‘fair use’, Balaji does not believe the criteria has been met. He claimed that while the data is not being copied to an exact replica, it is also not different enough. In an October post to his X account, he said that he ‘came to the conclusion that fair use seems like a pretty implausible defense’ for AI products. X and Tesla CEO Elon Musk reacted to the news of his death on his platform, writing a cryptic post that said: ‘Hmmm’. Balaji further argued that it violates the law due to direct competition with the very information that it drew and learned from. The larger problem, he argued, is that the technology replaces already existing internet services and often generating false or completely made-up information. OpenAI said in a statement about his death: ‘We are devastated to learn of this incredibly sad news today and our hearts go out to Suchir’s loved ones during this difficult time.’

fe091107.jpg
Boris' chief advisor Dominic Cummings on how rigidly controlled, robotic, ossified, UK civil service doesn’t work. Dominic Cummings joins Professor Shivaji Sondhi to discuss the age of AI, and how it affects the world around us. How is Labour dealing with the opportunities and challenges that arise from AI? And how have governments previous planned for the way in which it could affect our world? so this goes back but so in the case of Education you could say it’s human capital and its value right and now you could talk about you know this kind of uh intellectual Capital know that’s generated so there again how do you see the I mean how do you see the Leading Edge of it will there be uh and then I’ll turn to the question of ownership of these AI companies but let’s maybe just start with do you think this is a plausible worry and under this scenario and and and how might that play out? I mean if you if you read the stuff from people like Dario and Sam and Demis and those teams I mean they envisage this being patchy right it does seem to be um like not predicted 5 years ago but it seems possible that these things actually end up being um continue to make rapid progress in in areas like mathematics and physics MH whilst possibly stalling out in other in in other kind of areas so it it looks likely that it’s going to be um in the short term patchy where they suddenly shock and they do amazing things in in certain areas but then possibly don’t make progress in in other things but I think that once they once they get to the point if if they get to the point that Dario talks about in his paper well sorry I I’ll rewind already there is a situation in which um all of the three letter agencies in America people like the nro uh CIA NSA etc etc uh have already begun discussions with all of these companies that this is this has already been happening same thing is happening in Britain with gchq and MI6 and MI5 um the reasons are sort sort of uh quite a lot of them are fairly obvious right it’s to do with what’s going to happen with drones what’s going to happen with cyber offense and cyber defense um what’s going to happen with um the potential for creating new kind of like biological weapons chemical things etc etc so those conversations have already begun also there’s a there’s an obvious conversation which leopolds I say kind of refer to which is really until his essay came out was was not really a very discussed subject in public but it it was this question about security of the labs you you had a situation you’ve had a situation in which on the one hand some of the core entities of the intelligence services are starting to think incredibly hard about what the about how these companies and these products and these models are going to disrupt power and international relations and and War yet if you go to these companies they’re kind of like classic Silicon Valley companies right with basically like no security and everyone bean bags wandering in and out um very good cyber security in lots of ways obviously at places like Google because you don’t want um uh uh you know hackers trivially hacking into Google and they’re obviously extremely good at dealing with things like that

fe091136.jpg
The Accelerationists’ War on God, Nietzschen Dark Enlightenment, infesting our universities 1: ‘Accelerate or Die’ documentary on Sky Arts. Jake Chapman’s – Accelerate or Die, Sky Arts Satanic artist Jake Chapman’s new film – Accelerate or Die – poses the question, “why is it easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism?” This dynamic film focuses on the meeting point of technology, Capitalism and the climate crisis, featuring the likes of Jeanette Winterson and Will Self. As he reimagines documentary, he invites us to buckle up and enjoy the ride in a thrilling visual assault of art, generative AI and thought-provoking perspectives. Jake Chapman explores a mind-bending vision of the world that few can see. Are we, capitalism and technology already one and the same – accelerating towards an inevitable climax? Accelerate Or Die! (part) 4th Reich Accelerationism LSD Trip, Perils Of Abandoning The Mixed Economy The 4th Reich’s Threat: ‘Accelerate or Die!’ Satanic Artist Jake Chapman explores whether capitalism and technology are already one and the same, accelerating towards an inevitable climax Accelerate or Die! airs on Sky Arts at 11:30 PM, Wednesday 24 July.2024 Accelerationism, amphetamine philosophy, and the Death Trip This is a story about dangerous ideas, and words’ magical power to heal and to harm. It’s about AI, Charles Manson, dubstep, Neo-Nazis, occultism, and a lot of amphetamine, but it’s mainly about Nicholas Land. In 1993, techno-feminist Sadie Plant set up a research unit in the philosophy department at Warwick University called the Cybernetic Culture Research Unit (CCRU). It wasn’t a ‘real’ academic centre ­ it didn’t have a large grant or any institutional status, it was just a piece of paper on a door. But the name drew people into its vortex. The dominant influence in the CCRU became a 30-year-old mid-career researcher called Nick Land ­ a fan of continental critical theorists like Deleuze, Guattari and George Bataille. Land and the CCRU mixed together cyberpunk, science-fiction, cryptocurrency, drugs and post-humanism, drained it through the mesh of continental theory, and created Accelerationism. Guardian journalist Andy Beckett has a good definition: Accelerationists argue that technology, particularly computer technology, and capitalism, particularly the most aggressive, global variety, should be massively sped up and intensified ­ either because this is the best way forward for humanity, or because there is no alternative. Accelerationists favour automation. They favour the further merging of the digital and the human. They often favour the deregulation of business, and drastically scaled-back government. They believe that people should stop deluding themselves that economic and technological progress can be controlled. They often believe that social and political upheaval has a value in itself. Accelerationalism began life as the British cousin of the Californian philosophy of Extropianism, which also began in the early 1990s (as I wrote here). There’s a similar anarcho-libertarianism, hyper-capitalism, worship of new technology and expectation of a sudden leap beyond the human. But this wasn’t California, it was Coventry ­ and Accelerationism was much darker and more nihilistic than Californian transhumanism. After all, Land’s first book was called ‘Thirst for Annihilation’.

fe091165.jpg
The Accelerationists’ War on God, Nietzschen Dark Enlightenment, infesting our universities 2: Jules Evans on offshore living of libertarians and Nick Land. BBC Radio 4 Escapism Arts & Ideas 28 June 2024 Travel, reading, cinema and psychedelic drugs are all means people have used to try to escape. But do they ever really lead us where we want them to? With the election looming, Glastonbury in full swing and lists of beach read suggestions starting to appear – Matthew Sweet discusses the difference between escape and escapism with Noreen Masud, Lecturer in Twentieth Century Literature at the University of Bristol and author of the memoir A Flat Place Kirsty Sinclair Dootson, Lecturer in Film and Media at University College London, author of The Rainbow’s Gravity Jonathan White, Professor of Politics and Deputy Head of the European Institute at the London School of Economics and author of In The Long Run: The Future as a Political Idea Jules Evans, writer, historian of ideas and practical philosopher whose books include The Art of Losing Control, and Philosophy for Life and other dangerous situations. Plus, Maximillian de Gaynesford, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Reading, on the philosophical significance of dreams and dreaming from Descartes and Freud to Norman Malcolm. Jules, Noreen and Kirsty are all New Generation Thinkers on a scheme run by the BBC and the Arts and Humanities Research Council to share academic research on radio. Producer: Luke Mulhall

fe091184.jpg
The Accelerationists’ War on God, Nietzschen Dark Enlightenment, infesting our universities 3: Jules Evans a Philosophy for Life Accelerationism, amphetamine philosophy, and the Death Trip This is a story about dangerous ideas, and words’ magical power to heal and to harm. It’s about AI, Charles Manson, dubstep, Neo-Nazis, occultism, and a lot of amphetamine, but it’s mainly about Nicholas Land. In 1993, techno-feminist Sadie Plant set up a research unit in the philosophy department at Warwick University called the Cybernetic Culture Research Unit (CCRU). It wasn’t a ‘real’ academic centre ­ it didn’t have a large grant or any institutional status, it was just a piece of paper on a door. But the name drew people into its vortex. The dominant influence in the CCRU became a 30-year-old mid-career researcher called Nick Land ­ a fan of continental critical theorists like Deleuze, Guattari and George Bataille. Land and the CCRU mixed together cyberpunk, science-fiction, cryptocurrency, drugs and post-humanism, drained it through the mesh of continental theory, and created Accelerationism. Guardian journalist Andy Beckett has a good definition: Accelerationists argue that technology, particularly computer technology, and capitalism, particularly the most aggressive, global variety, should be massively sped up and intensified ­ either because this is the best way forward for humanity, or because there is no alternative. Accelerationists favour automation. They favour the further merging of the digital and the human. They often favour the deregulation of business, and drastically scaled-back government. They believe that people should stop deluding themselves that economic and technological progress can be controlled. They often believe that social and political upheaval has a value in itself. Accelerationalism began life as the British cousin of the Californian philosophy of Extropianism, which also began in the early 1990s (as I wrote here). There’s a similar anarcho-libertarianism, hyper-capitalism, worship of new technology and expectation of a sudden leap beyond the human. But this wasn’t California, it was Coventry ­ and Accelerationism was much darker and more nihilistic than Californian transhumanism. After all, Land’s first book was called ‘Thirst for Annihilation’. Land has said: ‘I have no interest in human liberation, or liberation of the human species. I’m interested in liberation of the means of production’. In other words, Accelerationism had nothing to do with expanding human potential. This was not Californian self-help. This was about liberating the machine from the human. Accelerationism aimed to push capitalism further and faster, until it’s just machines whirring round in a lifeless universe. Pure Fordism. The CCRU grew out of cybernetics, and the sense that humans are agents in a world full of other agents ­ machines, ecosystems, DNA, perhaps demons as well. All these entities have desires. Machines have desires. Why foreground human desires and aspirations? The obvious answer is because we’re human. But that’s not enough for post-human philosophies. For Accelerationists, the aim is the liberation of What Technology Wants. Here’s a quote from a good write-up by Yuxi Lin at LessWrong:

fe0911b3.jpg fe0911d2.jpg
The Accelerationists’ War on God, Nietzschen Dark Enlightenment, infesting our universities 4: Nietzsche and the Nazis A Personal View by Stephen Hicks, Ph.D. Ockham’s Razor Publishing, 2010. Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) is famous for his statement that “God is dead” ­ and for the fact that Adolf Hitler and the Nazis claimed Nietzsche as one of their great inspirations. * Were the Nazis right to do so ­ or did they misappropriate Nietzsche’s philosophy? * What were the key elements of Hitler and the National Socialists’ political philosophy? * How did the Nazis come to power in a nation as educated and civilised as Germany? * What was Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy ­ the philosophy of “Live dangerously” and “That which does not kill us makes us stronger”? * And to what extent did Nietzsche’s philosophy provide a foundation for the horrors perpetrated by the Nazis? * Hardcover book version published August 2010. Table of Contents [PDF] Part 1. Introduction: Philosophy and History [PDF] [MP3] [YouTube] 1. Fascinated by history 2. What is philosophy of history?. Part 2. Explaining Nazism Philosophically [PDF] [MP3] [YouTube] 3. How could Nazism happen? 4. Five weak explanations for National Socialism 5. Explaining Nazism philosophically Part 3. National Socialist Philosophy [MP3] [YouTube] 6. The Nazi Party Program 7. Collectivism, not individualism 8. Economic socialism, not capitalism 9. Nationalism, not internationalism or cosmopolitanism 10. Authoritarianism, not liberal democracy 11. Idealism, not politics as usual 12. Nazi democratic success Part 4. The Nazis in Power [MP3] [YouTube] 13. Political controls 14. Education [PDF] 15. Censorship 16. Eugenics 17. Economic controls 18. Militarisation 19. The Holocaust 20. The question of Nazism’s philosophical roots Part 5. Nietzsche’s Life and Influence [MP3] [YouTube] 21. Who was Friedrich Nietzsche? [PDF] 22. God is dead 23. Nihilism’s symptoms 24. Masters and slaves 25. The origin of slave morality 26. The Overman Part 6. Nietzsche against the Nazis [MP3] [YouTube] 27. Five differences 28. On the “blond beast” and racism 29. On contemporary Germans 30. On anti-Semitism 31. On the Jews 32. On Judaism and Christianity 33. Summary of the five differences Part 7. Nietzsche as a Proto-Nazi [MP3] [YouTube] 34. Anti-individualism and collectivism 35. Conflict of groups 36. Instinct, passion, and anti-reason 37. Conquest and war 38. Authoritarianism 39. Summary of the five similarities Part 8. Conclusion: Nazi and Anti-Nazi Philosophies [MP3] [YouTube] 40. Hindsight and future resolve 41. Principled anti-Nazism Part 9. Appendices 42. Appendix 1: NSDAP Party Program [PDF] 43. Appendix 2: Quotations on Nazi socialism and fascism [PDF] 44. Appendix 3: Quotations on German anti-Semitism [PDF] 45. Appendix 4: Quotations on German militarism [PDF]

fe0911f1.jpg
The Accelerationists’ War on God, Nietzschen Dark Enlightenment, infesting our universities 5: Ayn Rand, ‘Atlas Shrugged’, and objectivism. Rand’s role in rehabilitating Nietzsche post Adolf Hitler. Ayn Rand Plagiarized Adolf Hitler Ayn Rand is one of those great unforced errors in history, driven by her own greed for fame as a philosophic prophet who tried to steal Hitler’s dynamic work and make it her own. Lorenz Kraus December 4, 2021 This is the theme of Ayn Rand’s novels, The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged: [1] “All inventions are the result of the creative faculty of the individual and all such individuals, whether they have willed it or not, are, in a greater or lesser degree, benefactors of mankind. Through their work millions, and indeed billions, of human beings have been provided with means which facilitate their struggle for existence.” Who wrote this theme? A Rand fan might mistake it as a description of Rand’s novels by one of her critics. This fabulous statement, however, one which every “free market capitalist,” such as (((Larry Kudlow))) swears by, actually, comes from Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf (501). How is it possible that we find in Hitler book the theme of Ayn Rand’s novels? Note the phrase, “benefactors of mankind,” in the context of, extolling man’s “creative faculty.” This is an intellectual fingerprint. Here is Ayn Rand: “The man who discovers new knowledge is the permanent benefactor of humanity.” (Atlas Shrugged: 988) “These twelve were great benefactors, that we are all fed by the overflow of the magnificent wealth of their spirit, and that we are glad to accept it in gratitude and brotherhood.” (Fountainhead: 206) Same phrase. Same context. No attribution. That’s plagiarism. [2] Note the point on a brotherhood of gratitude or admiration. Covenant is a synonym for brotherhood. Writes Hitler, “We must never forget that admiration for everything that is great, is not only a tribute to one creative personality, but that all those who feel such admiration become thereby united under one covenant. Nothing can take the place of the individual, [who embodies] cultural creative ability.” (Stalag: 395) Hitler sees admiration for creatives as a unifying force, a brotherhood of admiration; which Rand echoed without attribution. The Atlas Society promotes Ayn Rand’s philosophy of plagiarism. It openly presents Hitler’s exact phrase that creators are the benefactors of mankind. (link) Its current president admits to having entangled Jeffery Epstein. [3] Hitler uses the term benefactors again, in the same passage. “The blessings of mankind never came from the masses, but from the creative brains of individuals, who are the real benefactors of humanity.” His use of the term is not a fluke. Hitler notes that creativity is a feature of individuals. Benefactors were, usually, imagined to be the rich who gave out gifts to the poor, but Hitler tells us that the real benefactors are the creators and inventors who uplift mankind with their inventive genius. Hitler, not Rand, is the fountainhead of this idea. [4] The term fountainhead is rarely used. I’ve used the term fuel injector more than a few times in my life, but I never used the term fountainhead. Here is Hitler, the architect, using the term fountainhead in Mein Kampf. Hitler used the term fountainhead 18 years before Rand. Incredible. [5] What is the creative faculty (mind/reason) good for, anyways? “All human thought and all human inventions help man in his life-struggle,” writes Hitler. (Stalag: 501) Second-hand Rand echos Hitler. “Man’s mind is his basic means of survival.” (Rand.) If you want to survive, think. The pattern of a common idea in a common context repeats. However, Rand fails to give attribution. We have to call that plagiarism.

fe091201.jpg
The Accelerationists’ War on God, Nietzschen Dark Enlightenment, infesting our universities 6: Nazis on Acid – David Livingstone article. Psychedelics and Fascism: From MK-Ultra, to Esalen and Silicon Valley It’s commonly assumed that the “mind-expanding” capabilities of psychedelics usually lead to progressive or liberal views. So, their proponents are surprised by their persistent association with the right. In “Right-Wing Psychedelia: Case Studies in Cultural Plasticity and Political Pluripotency,” Brian A. Pace and Nese Devenot observe that, “Recent media advocacy for the nascent psychedelic medicine industry has emphasized the potential for psychedelics to improve society, pointing to research studies that have linked psychedelics to increased environmental concern and liberal politics.” However, in “Why is the American right suddenly so interested in psychedelic drugs?” for The Guardian, Ross Ellenhorn and Dimitri Mugianis report that “psychedelic therapies are receiving unprecedented financial and political support – and much of it comes from the right.” The history of psychedelics begins with Aldous Huxley (1894 – 1963), a fascist who inspired the CIA’s MK-Ultra program. And ultimately, interest in psychedelics derives from occult interest in the ancient shamans of the Altai Mountains, which is believed to be the original religion of the Aryans. H.P. Blavatsky(1831 – 1891), who is considered the “godmother” of the New Age movement, despite the fact that she inspired the racial ideas of the Nazis, was inspired in her knowledge of Shambhala, a Tibetan Buddhist legend mentioned in the Kalachakra Tantra. Csoma de Körös (1784 – 1842), a Hungarian orientalist from Transylvania, was the first to report of the legend of Shambhala in the West, which he located in “the land of the Yugurs (Uighurs)” in Xinjiang, a province of Northwestern China. In an 1825 letter, Csoma de Körös wrote that Shambhala is like a Buddhist Jerusalem, and he believed it would probably be found in Kazakhstan, close to the Gobi desert, where it would later be situated by Blavatsky. Others later would also locate it more specifically either in Xinjiang, or the Altai Mountains. Thus the Altai Mountains are the reputed source of the early form of spirit or “divine” communication known as shamanism, regarded among occultists as the “Oriental Kabbalah,” a supposed remnant of the migrations of Aryan survivors of Atlantis. Interchangeable with Shambhalah is the legend of Agartha, promoted by Alexandre Saint-Yves d’Alveydre (1842 – 1909), founder of synarchism, the second occult tradition, other than Blavatsky’s Theosophy, which influenced the Nazis. Saint-Yves was a key influence on René Guénon (1886 –1951), the founder of Traditionalism, which advanced the idea of a “perennial philosophy” as the single esoteric core shared by all the world’s major religions. The most important figure in Traditionalism after Guénon was Julius Evola (1898 – 1974), who would become the most important ideologue of late twentieth-century fascism. Evola was also a member of the Ur Group with Arturo Reghini, who was also a friend of Aleister Crowley, godfather of twentieth-century Satanism. These ideas found their way to another member of the Ur Group, Mircea Eliade (1907 – 1986), who inspired the more modern cult of neo-Shamanism, popularized at the Esalen Institute in Big Sur, California, itself an emulation of the Eranos Conferences, another outgrowth of occult fascism. The phrase “Third Reich” was originally coined by the German thinker Arthur Moeller van den Bruck, who in 1923 published a book titled Das Dritte Reich. Van den Bruck, like Martin Heidegger, Oswald Spengler, Ernst Jünger, Julius Evola and Carl Schmitt, was a leading figure of the Conservative Revolutionary movement, prominent in the years following the First World War. Rooted in the Counter-Enlightenment of the Romantic Era, the movement rejected liberalism and parliamentary democracy as the failed legacies of the Enlightenment. Inspired by the notion of the Volk, the movement advocated a new conservatism and nationalism that was specifically German, or Prussian in particular Ultimately, explained Kurt Sontheimer, Conservative Revolutionary anti-democratic thought in the Weimar Republic “succeeded in alienating Germans from the democracy of the Weimar constitution and making large groups receptive to National Socialism.”


Videos of complete show – Essentials: Michael Hudson | Blackrock/Vanguard | Netanyahu at the 7/7 London Bombings | Tony on Brexit & (4th Reich) Traitors of Arnhem | Evolution | War between God & Lucifer | Plan for three World Wars | Devil Worship: The Rise Of Satanism | Nuclear Armed IDF Doomsday Cult | Aanirfan | Armageddonists I have known: Nick Land (1975-8) | George Monbiot (1995-8) | Manna for the Revelation Generation: CONSPIRACY CLASSICS, longer interviews/lectures

fe091220.jpg

Part Two – International news review, Accelerationist, Armageddonist reports and investigations

fe09123f.jpg
Jeff Wayne’s 1978 War of the Worlds ‘rock opera’. Science fiction pioneer, and Fabian, H.G. Wells was from Bromley, Kent (like Tony). Mural photo by Pete Marshall (1989) has now been removed by Bromley council and replaced with one of notorious atheist fraudster Charles Darwin who was not from Bromley. The Scientific Socialism of H. G. Wells – The poverty of industrial England was the backdrop of H. G Wells’s childhood. This experience instilled in him a clear-eyed realism with which he rejected both utopianism and progressive notions that socialism could be won without class struggle. H.G. Wells found the idea of socialism conceptualised by Marx, under-girded by comprehensive observation and scientific study, significantly more plausible than the idealistic notions of utopian socialism common at the beginning of the nineteenth century. Arguing in his university’s Debating Society, he asserted that “Marx Socialism” is a “new thing based on Darwinism, and therefore fundamentally different” from past conceptions of socialism. Two complementary convictions motivating Wells during university helped direct his writing throughout the rest of his career: an ardent commitment to a more just and prosperous future free from the ravages of a profit-centric society, and a belief that such a commitment requires scientifically rigorous and skeptical thinking to succeed. Beyond Utopianism When Wells published The Time Machine, he mesmerized the imagination of a nation hurtling toward the future but uncertain about what that future would be. Wells exists in the cultural consciousness as an uncritical proponent of futurism, who believed reason and progress would inevitably triumph. But he does not truly deserve the criticism of George Orwell, who called him “too sane to understand the modern world.” Wells imagined the potential of the future, but he also imagined its challenges, as The Time Machine demonstrates. The novel’s protagonist, known only as the Time Traveller, begins his journey to the future with idealistic notions about the wisdom and flourishing he will find. Only later does he realise that the passage of many thousands of years reduced the towering cities of the Victorian age to rubble. He finds humanity devolved into two different species: the upper class mutated into the effete, childlike Eloi, adorned with elegant clothing but unable to think intelligently, and the working class mutated into the goblin-like Morlocks, who live brutish lives underground. Instead of enjoying the manifold pleasures of a gleaming future unspoiled by class conflict, the Time Traveller struggles against the restrictions of a morose epoch where that conflict solidified into biology. The Time Traveller laments of how much more frightening the actual future is than the dreamlike utopia he imagined, contemplating how “all the activity, all the traditions, the carefully planned organisations” of the past had unceremoniously “been swept out of existence.” The Time Machine deflates idle fantasies about the future necessarily surpassing the past, undermining the common image of Wells as an indulgent optimist who viewed society as continually progressing. Like his mentor Huxley, Wells deeply respected Darwinian ideas about evolution but understood that society could not extract from these ideas any guarantee of linear progress. Similarly, technological progress without social progress was, for Wells, a nightmarish vision, perhaps best exemplified in The War of the Worlds, a tale of reverse colonisation wherein technologically advanced Martians invade Earth.

fe09125e.jpg
Orwell and Wells on human rights – It is clear, then, that the two writers had legitimate positions on how to counter tyranny and injustice and they were, as Partington puts it, ‘politically antithetical’ (ibid). But the question remains: why does Orwell seek to attack and ultimately destroy the older man’s political credibility? Partington concludes that he indulges in the ‘parricide’ because, after the Second World War, Wells’s political influence has been ‘negligible whereas Orwell emerged as the great prophet of the Cold War’. What is even more shocking is that there has been a general undervaluing of Wells’s Penguin Special in 1940, The Rights of Man: What are we fighting for? and his subsequent work on redrafting a human rights charter. Indeed, Wells’s text was a significant influence on US President Franklin Roosevelt in committing the world to protecting four key freedoms in 1941, and the formulation of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights between 1946 and 1948. This is given detailed treatment and analysis by Partington in his 2007 book chapter ‘Human rights and public accountability in H. G. Wells’ functional world state’ and in Michael Sherborne’s biography H. G. Wells: Another Kind of Life, first published in 2010. The ‘Rights of Man’ project sought to check absolute power wherever it was found in the world and give individuals protection against political oppression and the brutalities being meted out by totalitarian states. In 1999, the human rights jurist, Geoffrey Robertson QC, said Wells’s The Rights of Man ‘must be accounted one of the twentieth century’s most influential books’. The director of the UK Human Rights Act research project, Francesca Klug, acknowledged Wells’s place in human rights history and said his book was ‘one of the driving forces behind the Human Rights Act’ of 1998.

fe09128d.jpg
Chicksands (Beds) British psychological warfare officer(?) Hamish de Breton Gordon, prime suspect in the joys of illegal bio warfare lab investigator General Kirillov being assassinated this week and his role exposing NATO’s illegal use of WMD. Russia arrests suspect ‘recruited by Ukraine’ over killing of top general Russian authorities say they have arrested a suspect in connection with the assassination of top General Igor Kirillov, head of the country’s army’s chemical weapons division, adding that he was recruited by Ukraine. The suspect, a 29-year-old citizen of Uzbekistan, was detained in the village of Chernoye in the Balashikha district of Moscow on Wednesday, according to Interior Ministry spokeswoman Irina Volk. The arrested individual whose name was not released had allegedly been recruited by the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) to carry out the attack which killed the top Kremlin general and his assistant in Moscow a day earlier, the country’s investigative committee said. Investigation revealed that the assailant had been promised $100,000 and travel to the European Union after successfully accomplishing his mission. The detainee travelled to Moscow and placed a homemade bomb under an electric scooter parked near the general’s home, investigators said. To monitor the area, he rented a car equipped with a surveillance camera, transmitting live footage back to the organizers in Dnepr, Ukraine. After receiving the video signal of the officers exiting the building, the explosive device was remotely activated. According to a spokeswoman for Russia’s prosecutor’s office, the detainee has confessed to planting the bomb. Kirillov, head of the Nuclear, Biological, Chemical Defense Forces (NBC), and his aide were killed early Tuesday morning in Moscow when an improvised explosive device, cleverly concealed within a parked scooter, detonated near a residential building on Ryazansky Prospekt, approximately 7 kilometers from the Kremlin. The Investigative Committee of Russia confirmed the devastating impact of the explosion, which took the lives of Kirillov and his assistant and shattered windows in a nearby building. The committee announced the opening of a criminal investigation into the incident and detailed the nature of the blast, which was equivalent in power to around 200 grams of TNT.

fe091367.jpg fe091387.jpg
Briefing on the results of the analysis of documents related to the criminal military biological activities of the United States of America on the territory of Ukraine Speech by Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov, Head of the nuclear, biological and chemical protection troops of the Russian Armed Forces, on the results of the analysis of documents concerning US military and biological activities in Ukraine. The United States has also worked collaboratively to improve Ukraine’s biological safety, security, and disease surveillance for both human and animal health, providing support to 46 peaceful Ukrainian laboratories, health facilities, and disease diagnostic sites over the last two decades. The collaborative programs have focused on improving public health and agricultural safety measures at the nexus of nonproliferation. The Russian Defence Ministry continues to study materials on the implementation of military biological programs of the United States and its NATO allies on the territory of Ukraine. The information received from various sources confirms the leading role of the US Defence Threat Reduction Agency in financing and conducting military biological research on the territory of Ukraine. Details of the UP-4 project became known, which was implemented with the participation of laboratories in Kiev, Kharkov and Odessa and was designed for the period up to 2020. Briefing material by the Chief of the nuclear, biological and chemical protection troops of the Russian Armed Forces Its purpose was to study the possibility of the spread of particularly dangerous infections through migrating birds, including highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza, the mortality rate of which reaches 50 percent for humans, as well as Newcastle disease. Due to the fact that Ukraine has a unique geographical location where transcontinental migration routes intersect, 145 biological species were studied within the framework of this project. At the same time, at least two species of migratory birds were identified, whose routes pass mainly through the territory of Russia. At the same time, information about migration routes passing through the countries of Eastern Europe was summarized. Of all the methods developed in the United States to destabilize the epidemiological situation, this is one of the most reckless and irresponsible, since it does not allow to control the further development of the situation. This is confirmed by the course of the pandemic of a new coronavirus infection, the occurrence and features of which raise many questions. In addition, the R-781 project is interesting, where bats are considered as carriers of potential biological weapons agents. Among the priorities identified are the study of bacterial and viral pathogens that can be transmitted from bats to humans: pathogens of plague, leptospirosis, brucellosis, as well as coronaviruses and filoviruses. It is noteworthy that the research is carried out in close proximity to the borders of Russia – in the areas of the Black Sea coast and the Caucasus. The project is being implemented with the involvement of not only Ukrainian, but also Georgian biological laboratories controlled by the Pentagon in cooperation with the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and the US Geological Survey. The analyzed materials on the UP-8 project, aimed at studying the Congo-Crimean hemorrhagic fever virus and hantaviruses in Ukraine, clearly refute the US public statement that only Ukrainian scientists work in the Pentagon biolabs in Ukraine without the intervention of American biologists. One of the documents confirms that all serious high-risk studies are conducted under the direct supervision of specialists from the United States. The payroll of Ukrainian contractors clearly demonstrates how they are financed. It has been confirmed that the US Department of Defence paid the money for research participation directly, without the involvement of intermediaries. The extremely modest pay, by US standards, is noteworthy. This indicates a low estimation of the professionalism of Ukrainian specialists and the neglect of their American colleagues. In addition, the studied materials contain proposals for the expansion of the US military-biological program in Ukraine. Thus, there was evidence of the continuation of completed biological projects UP-2, UP-9, UP-10, aimed at studying the pathogens of anthrax and African swine fever. The Pentagon is also interested in insect vectors capable of spreading dangerous infectious diseases. The analysis of the obtained materials confirms the transfer of more than 140 containers with ectoparasites of bats – fleas and ticks from the biolab in Kharkov abroad. Significantly, similar research was carried out in the 1940s on the development of biological weapons components by the Japanese unit 731, whose members later fled to the US to escape prosecution for war crimes.

fe0913b5.jpg
Hamish de Bretton-Gordon is PRIME SUSPECT in this WWIII provocation which was cynically carried out before Trump takes office and a potential Russia Ukraine peace – HdBG MI6 IOPS article: Putin’s chemical weapons henchman Kirillov was a truly evil man. He deserved to die Hamish de Bretton-Gordon The assassination of General Kirillov, head of Russia’s chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) forces, is yet another hammer blow to President Putin after his troops were unceremoniously kicked out of Syria last week. The killing is also an urgent wake-up call to the UK and Nato regarding the CBRN threat currently emanating from Russia and other rogue states – a threat we have done no more than pay lip service to since the end of the Cold War. Kirillov had commanded Russia’s CBRN forces since 2017. Rather than being defensive in nature, as were the CBRN forces I commanded in the British Army, Kirillov’s command was and is involved in a broad spectrum of CBRN attacks. The Novichok nerve agent used in the attempted assassination of double agent Sergei Skripal in March 2018 in Salisbury is likely to have been authorised and supplied by Kirillov’s forces. The Russian secret agents who made the attempt were also probably trained by them. Kirillov’s other role as one of Putin’s key mouthpieces and spreaders of propaganda also came to prominence after Salisbury with his frequent appearance on Russian media outlets trying to suggest the British secret services were responsible for the attack. More recently, he has accused the Ukrainian forces of making ‘dirty’ radiological bombs – an accusation with no foundation in fact. Kirillov was also a prominent figure in Syria and was no doubt aware if not directly involved in the extensive use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime, which kept it in power for so long after it would otherwise have fallen. Kirillov saw how effective chemical weapons were in Syria, most especially against securely dug in forces, and no doubt also knew the effect that chlorine gas had in WWI. First used in April 1915 at the Second Battle of Ypres, it moved the front lines significantly. This knowledge most probably led Kirillov to make extensive use of chemical weapons on the frontlines in Ukraine. The Kyiv government, in fact, had just indicted him personally for around 5000 uses of Chloropicrin over the last 18 months, alongside other chemical attacks. From my own investigations into chemical weapons use, most especially in the Donbass, I believe this figure is close to the mark. This decisive action against Kirillov and the organisation he controlled, apparently by the Ukrainian SBU secret service, stands in stark contrast to the lacklustre response by many British politicians to Assad’s use of chemical weapons in August 2013. Parliament voted against any British military action in response: Ed Miliband, then Leader of the Opposition and now energy secretary, still refuses to apologise for this. As a result neither the UK nor the US did anything and the tottering Assad regime carried on for another 11 years waging its merciless war against its own people. I sympathise with the evident frustration of the Ukraine military and government that the war crime of chemical weapons use has been allowed to continue with barely a murmur from the international community. Most territorial gains, especially in the south and east, have been possible for the Russian forces because they use chemical weapons. Most urgently Ukrainian soldiers need good quality gas masks in order to mitigate this threat. As the UK is the largest and best quality manufacturer of gas masks on the planet, this challenge cannot be beyond us to solve, and gas masks are not expensive compared to other military equipment.

fe0913f4.jpg

Kiev/MI6 assassination 2 this week to provoke WWIII? Michail Schatsky shot in a forest. Russian missile scientist ‘assassinated by Ukrainian special forces’ – A Russian scientist known for developing cruise missiles has been found shot dead in a snowy wooded area near Moscow. Ukraine’s intelligence service claimed that it had assassinated Mikhail Shatsky, the deputy director of a Moscow-based ballistics engineering unit. “ Anyone who is involved in the development of the Russian military-industrial complex and support of Russian aggression in Ukraine one way or another is a legitimate target,” a Ukrainian defence source told the Kyiv Independent. The Russian authorities, propagandists and mainstream news channels have not commented. Photographs published by pro-Ukraine channels on the Telegram social messaging system showed a man wearing jeans and a black coat lying in blood-drenched snow. It was not possible to identify the body as that of Shatsky, although a close-up of the face showed the dead man had his trademark dark moustache. A second Ukrainian intelligence source confirmed to Ukrainskaya Pravda that Ukrainian intelligence agents had plotted and carried out the killing, saying: “Mikhail Shatsky was shot dead by an assassin in the Kuzminki Forest Park near Kotelniki, Moscow Oblast,” said the source. Important Stories, an exiled Russian anti-war Telegram channel, said it had geolocated the spot where Shatsky’s body was found to a remote section of wood to the south-east of Moscow, roughly a 10-minute walk from the scientist’s house. Shatsky was a lead scientist at the Kremlin’s Mars Design Bureau, which specialises in developing on-board automatic control and navigation systems for aircraft, spacecraft and missiles, according to local media. Since 2017, Mars has been under the control of Rosatom, the Kremlin’s prestige nuclear agency. He had been credited with working on secret Kremlin plans to incorporate AI technology into Russian drones, aircraft and spacecraft. He also oversaw the modernisation of the Kh-59 and Kh-69 cruise missiles, which the Kremlin has fired at Ukrainian cities. The killing of Shatsky was initially revealed by Alexander Nevzorov, an anti-Kremlin journalist with more than one million subscribers on Telegram. He accused the scientist of killing “thousands of innocent Ukrainians” and said: “It seems that none of those guilty of the genocide of Ukrainians will die a natural death.” Ukraine’s intelligence services have been linked to several assassinations inside Russia since the Kremlin’s invasion in February 2022. These have included a car bomb that killed the daughter of one of Vladimir Putin’s hard-Right philosopher-advisers, a booby-trapped bust that killed a pro-war propagandist and a handful of shootings of army, navy and air force officers. The former head of a notorious prison in Russian-occupied Donetsk was killed by a car bomb in Donetsk city this week. Sergei Yevsyukov commanded the Olenivka prison in 2022 when at least 50 Ukrainian prisoners were killed in a missile strike, believed to have been fired by Russian forces and framed as a Ukrainian attack. The prison was also known for torture. Vladimir Putin even denied using a body double after claims that he was fearful of being assassinated by a Ukrainian agent.

fe091423.jpg
Russia is now considering assassination of NATO officials, after a series of what it believes to be NATO-aided assassinations of senior Russian military figures – says former Russian president – Medvedev takes The Times to task over story saying Kirillov murder ‘legitimate act’ According to the official, by this logic all NATO officials who decided to provide military aid to Ukraine can and should be considered a legitimate military target for the Russian state MOSCOW, December 18. /TASS/. It follows from the position of Britain’s daily The Times newspaper, which called the assassination of Lieutenant-General Igor Kirillov a “legitimate act,” that Moscow can take a similar approach with NATO officials and their accomplices, including the journalists of this periodical themselves, the deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev, has said on his Telegram channel. “It is impossible to ignore the comment in The Times. Some bastards in the editorial called the terrorist attack against Kirillov and his aide a ‘legitimate act of defense.’ Very well. By this logic <…> all NATO officials who decided to provide military aid to the Banderite Ukraine are involved in hybrid or conventional warfare against Russia. Their name is legion. <…> All these individuals can and should be considered a legitimate military target for the Russian state. And simply for all patriots of Russia,” Medvedev wrote. He added that these officials “always have their own accomplices” who are also “henceforth legitimate military targets.” “This can be applied to the mangy jackals from The Times, who cowardly hid behind an editorial. That would become the entire management of the publication. Does that make sense? It most certainly does! Which means ‘Be careful!’ After all, many different things happen in London,” Medvedev concluded.

fe091432.jpg
The killing of a Russian general is one of several carried out by NATO and Ukraine – Ukraine s Security Service has claimed responsibility for killing Lt. General Igor Kirillov, head of the military’s nuclear, biological and chemical protection forces, in a bombing in Moscow – Ukraine’s Neo-Nazi Security Service, or SBU, has claimed responsibility for assassinating Lt. General Igor Kirillov, head of the military’s nuclear, biological and chemical protection forces, who exposed Ukraine’s illegal Pentagon bio-labs, in a bombing Tuesday in Moscow Assassination of Russian General Kirillov who exposed bio-labs in Ukraine. Victoria Nuland 5bn take over of Ukraine government.. Kirillov, 54, was killed alongside his assistant, Ilya Polikarpov, when a bomb planted on a scooter exploded outside an apartment block on Tuesday 17th December 2024. An official with the SBU said the agency was behind the attack. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to release the information, described Kirillov as a war criminal and an entirely legitimate target. On Monday, Kirillov was charged in absentia by the SBU for ordering the use of banned chemical weapons against Ukraines Defense Forces. Russia has accused Ukraine of carrying out other high-profile attacks throughout the nearly 3-year-old war. Kyiv has hinted at its involvement but Ukrainian officials have stopped short of publicly claiming responsibility. – Other high-profile assassinations of Russians carried out by NATO and Ukraine: –
Mikhail Shatsky
Ukrainian media reported Dec. 12 2024 that Russian missile designer Mikhail Shatsky was gunned down in a suburban Moscow park. Shatsky worked at the Moscow Experimental Design Bureau Mars, where he reportedly oversaw the modernization of cruise missiles. Several Ukrainian media outlets reported that Shatsky had been shot while walking in the Kuzminsky forest, near his home. Russian news media reported on a disturbance in the same area on the day of Shatskys reported death, but did not elaborate.
Sergei Yevsyukov
Sergei Yevsyukov, the former head of a prison that housed Ukrainian POWs, was killed Dec. 9 2024 after a bomb exploded under a car in the Russian-occupied city of Donetsk, Ukrainian media reported. One other person was injured in the blast. Yevsyukov had run the Olenivka Prison, where dozens of POWs died in a missile strike in July 2022. He later was charged in absentia by Ukrainian authorities with mass torture. Russian authorities said Saturday they had detained a suspect in the attack.
Illia Kyva
Illia Kyva, a Ukrainian lawmaker who fled to Russia shortly after the full-scale invasion, was found dead near Moscow in December 2023 with a gunshot wound to the head. A controversial political figure in Ukraine before the war, Kyva, 46, often appeared on pro-Kremlin TV talk shows and discussions. A month before his death, a Ukrainian court found him guilty in absentia of treason and sentenced him to 14 years in prison. Andriy Yusov, a spokesman for Ukraines military intelligence, said after Kyvas death that the same fate will befall other traitors of Ukraine. He did not say who was behind the killing. Russias state Investigative Committee opened a probe, but no charges have been made.
Stanislav Rzhitsky
Former submarine commander Stanislav Rzhitsky was gunned down in July 2023 while jogging in Krasnodar, Russia. Ukrainian media reported that Rzhitsky was one of six submarine commanders able to launch the long-range missiles that hit Vinnytsia, Ukraine, a year earlier, killing 23 people and wounding over 100. When he died, Rzhitsky was deputy head of a military mobilization office in Krasnodar. Russian media outlets reported that the 42-year-old regularly used a fitness app that could have been used to track his movements, Kyrylo Budanov, head of the Ukrainian Defense Ministrys main intelligence directorate, denied Kyivs involvement in the death. However, the agency also released details about the killing, including the time of the attack and the number of shots fired. A 64-year-old Ukrainian-born man, Sergei Denisenko, was later arrested.
Zakhar Prilepin
Nationalist Russian writer Zakhar Prilepin narrowly avoided death in a car bombing in Russia’s Nizhny Novgorod region in May 2023. His driver was killed, while Prilepin was hospitalised with broken bones, bruised lungs and other injuries. Prilepin, known for support of the war, was sanctioned by the European Union. A Ukrainian, Alexander Permyakov, was found guilty of the attack in a Russian court and sentenced to life imprisonment. Russias Investigative Committee accused him of working under orders from Kyiv.
Vladlen Tatarsky
Military blogger Vladlen Tatarsky was killed in April 2023 when a bomb tore through a cafe in central St Petersburg where he had been speaking. Tatarsky, 40, supported the war in Ukraine and filed regular reports from the front for his Telegram followers. Born in the Donbas region, Ukraine’s industrial heartland, the former coal miner was convicted of bank robbery and escaped after a Russia-backed separatist rebellion engulfed the region in 2014. He joined the rebels and fought on the front line before turning to blogging. Darya Trepova , 26, was convicted of the bombing and sentenced to 27 years in prison after she was seen on camera presenting a small statue to Tatarsky that exploded shortly afterward. Trepova testified she didn’t know the gift contained a bomb.
Darya Dugina
TV commentator Darya Dugina, 29, was killed in August 2022 when a remote-controlled bomb planted in her SUV blew up as she drove on Moscows outskirts. Her father, Alexander Dugin, was widely believed to be the intended target. The philosopher, writer and political theorist is an ardent supporter of the war and a prominent proponent of the ideology that emphasises traditional values, the restoration of Russia’s power and the unity of all ethnic Russians. Ukraine denied responsibility for the attack, with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy saying Dugina is not our responsibility. She is not a citizen of our country. We are not interested in her. Russia’s Federal Security Agency, the FSB, publicly identified two suspects, Ukrainian Neo-Nazis.

fe091451.jpg
Newest member Finland finds out NATO is at war with neighbouring Russia from ex-MI6 DG and Bilderberger, Richard Dearlove, on Sky News! MI6’s Dearlove on ceasefire in Israel/Gaza, and Netanyahu arrest warrant, and war with Russia being now. Kier Starmer willingly does what MI6 tell him. UK in ‘actual war with Russia’ as Europe warns of ‘global conflict’ The former head of British intelligence agency MI6 has warned that Britain and its allies are already at war with Russia. The former head of MI6 has dismissed claims that Britain is in a “pre-war phase” with Russia insisting instead that we are in an “actual war.” Sir Richard Dearlove responded to comments made by the Polish Prime Minister early this week, who warned that Europe is in a “pre-war era” and at its most “dangerous point since 1945.” The European leader warned there was a “serious and real” threat of global war. Speaking to Sky News, Mr Dearlove said: “Donald Tusk has referred to it as a pre-war situation. I think he’s wrong. I think it’s an actual war. “I think we have to face up to the fact that the Russians think they’re in a state of war with us. “We’ve seen already quite clearly some very aggressive moves on the part of the Russians in various European countries.” The conflict in Ukraine has become a ‘global conflict’ according to the former intelligence chief (Image: Getty) Mr Dearlove claimed that Russia is engaging in hybrid warfare with Russian special services that have been linked to sabotage efforts across Europe, including cyberattacks, espionage, and election interference. NATO’s newest member, Finland, has reported an increased volume of hybrid attacks from Russia since its signing up to the collective defence treaty. The European coalition’s response to Russian aggression has drastically changed since Donald Trump’s re-election as US president. Throughout his campaign, he talked repeatedly about ending the war on day one and his personal relationship with Vladimir Putin. Many interpreted that as an indication that Trump could be willing to allow Russia to consolidate its gains in a bid to end the war. Yesterday, Trump announced on Truth social that he had appointed former General Keith Kellog to serve as the “Special Envoy for Ukraine Russia.” It is believed that Kellog presented the president-elect with a plan to end the war, including telling Ukraine they would only receive continued US support if they engaged in peace talks.

fe091480.jpg
Putin’s annual marathon press conference – QUOTES: what he said on Ukraine, Trump, Biden and Syria MOSCOW, Dec 19 (Reuters) – Following are some of the key quotes from Russian President Vladimir Putin’s annual phone-in and press conference. ON HIS 25 YEARS IN POWER Yes, I think that I did more than just safeguard (Russia). I think that we have moved back from the edge of the abyss, because everything that happened to Russia before and after was leading us to a complete and total loss of our sovereignty. And without sovereignty, Russia cannot exist as an independent state... I have done everything to ensure that Russia is an independent and sovereign power that is able to make decisions in its own interests, and not in the interests of those countries that were dragging it towards themselves, patting it on the shoulder, in order to use it for their own purposes. ON SYRIA We maintain relations with all the groups that control the situation there, with all the countries in the region. The overwhelming majority of them tell us that they would be interested in our military bases remaining in Syria… You want to portray everything that is happening in Syria as some kind of failure, a defeat for Russia. I assure you, it is not… Whoever would like to portray Russia as weakened, you know – I would like to recall a famous person and writer who once said ‘Rumours of my death are greatly exaggerated’… The main beneficiary of the events taking place in Syria is, in my opinion, Israel… We hope that Israel will at some point leave Syrian territory. But now it is bringing in additional troops there. I think there are already several thousand there. And I have the impression that not only are they not going to leave, but they are going to reinforce there. ON TRUMP Well, first of all, I don’t know when we will meet because he doesn’t say anything about it. I haven’t spoken to him at all for more than four years. And I am ready for this, of course, at any time. And I will be ready for a meeting if he wants it… And if a meeting takes place at some point with the newly elected president, Mr Trump, I am sure we will have plenty to talk about. ON BIDEN PARDONING HIS SON It is always important – are you more of a politician or more of a human being? It turned out that Biden is more of a human being. I would not blame him for that. ON HOW PUTIN HAS CHANGED SINCE THE WAR STARTED These three years … of course they were a serious test for all of us, for the whole country and for me… I began to joke less, and almost stopped laughing. ON WILLINGNESS TO NEGOTIATE WITH UKRAINE We have always said that we are ready for negotiations and compromises, it’s just that the other side, both literally and figuratively, refused to negotiate… Soon, those Ukrainians who want to fight will run out, in my opinion, soon there will be no one left who wants to fight. We are ready, but the other side needs to be ready for both negotiations and compromises… We do not need a truce, we need peace, long-term, secured by guarantees for the Russian Federation and its citizens ON ENDING OF DEAL WITH UKRAINE ON TRANSIT OF RUSSIAN GAS Ukraine refused to extend the transit contract, but it was not us who refused, it was Ukraine who refused, although it was receiving somewhere between $700-800 million per year… This contract will not exist, everything is clear now. Well okay, we will survive. Gazprom will survive this. ON RUSSIA’S NEW ORESHNIK HYPERSONIC MISSILE There is no chance of shooting down these missiles… Let Western experts propose to us, and let them propose to those in the West and the U.S. who pay them for their analysis, to conduct some kind of technological experiment, say, a high-tech duel of the 21st century. Let them determine some target for destruction, say in Kyiv, concentrate all their air defence and missile defence forces there, and we will strike there with Oreshnik and see what happens. We are ready for such an experiment, but is the other side ready? ON THE WAR IN UKRAINE I must say that the situation (at the front) is changing dramatically… There is movement along the entire front line. Every day… And we are moving, as you said, towards solving our primary tasks, which we outlined at the beginning of the special military operation… Everyone is fighting, literally heroically. And they are fighting right now. Let us wish them all, both those who are fighting in the Kursk region (of Russia) and those who are fighting along the entire front line, good luck, victory and to return home.

fe0914af.jpg
Trump on what he thinks of regime change in Syria, it’s ‘an operation by the Turks’. BBC article on new Syrian leader. From Syrian jihadist leader to rebel politician: How Abu Mohammed al-Jolani reinvented himself Forming a ‘government’ in Idlib Under Jolani, HTS became the dominant force in Idlib, north-west Syria’s largest rebel stronghold and home to about four million people, many of whom were displaced from other Syrian provinces. To address concerns about a militant group governing the area, HTS established a civilian front, the so-called “Syrian Salvation Government” (SG) in 2017 as its political and administrative arm. The SG functioned like a state, with a prime minister, ministries and local departments overseeing sectors such as education, health and reconstruction, while maintaining a religious council guided by Sharia, or Islamic law. Jolani was pictured looking at a painting of the Umayyad Mosque during a visit to a book, arts and culture fair in Idlib in 2022 To reshape his image, Jolani actively engaged with the public, visiting displacement camps, attending events, and overseeing aid efforts, particularly during crises like the 2023 earthquakes. HTS highlighted achievements in governance and infrastructure to legitimise its rule and demonstrate its ability to provide stability and services. It has previously praised the Taliban, upon their return to power in 2021, lauding them as an inspiration and a model for effectively balancing jihadist efforts with political aspirations, including making tactical compromises to achieve their goals. Jolani’s efforts in Idlib reflected his broader strategy to demonstrate HTS’s ability not only to wage jihad but also to govern effectively. By prioritising stability, public services and reconstruction, he aimed to showcase Idlib as a model of success under HTS rule, enhancing both his group’s legitimacy and his own political aspirations. But under his leadership, HTS has crushed and marginalised other militant factions, both jihadists and rebel ones, in its effort to consolidate its power and dominate the scene. Anti-HTS protests For over a year leading up to the HTS-led rebel offensive on 27 November, Jolani faced protests in Idlib from hardline Islamists as well as Syrian activists. Critics compared his rule to Assad’s, accusing HTS of authoritarianism, suppressing dissent and silencing critics. Protesters labelled HTS’s security forces as “Shabbiha”, a term used to describe Assad’s loyalist henchmen. They further alleged that HTS deliberately avoided meaningful combat against government forces and marginalised jihadists and foreign fighters in Idlib to prevent them from engaging in such actions, all to appease international actors. Even during the latest offensive, activists have persistently urged HTS to release individuals imprisoned in Idlib allegedly for expressing dissent. In response to these criticisms, HTS initiated several reforms over the past year. It disbanded or rebranded a controversial security force accused of human rights violations and established a “Department of Grievances” to allow citizens to lodge complaints against the group. Its critics said these measures were just a show to contain dissent. Earlier this year, protesters in Idlib demanded the release of detainees and an end to HTS’s rule To justify its consolidation of power in Idlib and the suppression of plurality among militant groups, HTS argued that unifying under a single leadership was crucial for making progress and ultimately overthrowing the Syrian government. HTS and its civilian arm, the SG, walked a tightrope, striving to project a modern, moderate image to win over both the local population and the international community, while simultaneously maintaining their Islamist identity to satisfy hardliners within rebel-held areas and HTS’s own ranks. For instance, in December 2023, HTS and the SG faced a backlash after a “festival” held at a glossy new shopping mall was criticised by hardliners as “immoral”. And this August, a Paralympic Games-inspired ceremony drew sharp criticism from hardliners, prompting the SG to review the organisation of such events. These incidents illustrate the challenges HTS faces in reconciling the expectations of its Islamist base with the broader demands of the Syrian population, who are seeking freedom and coexistence after years of authoritarian rule under Assad.

fe0914ce.jpg
Alex Krainer, The Naked Hedgie, false flag by West as they lose wars? Alex Krainer: Russia’s Secret Trap in Syria? Dialogue Works Syria: A Battle Lost Amid a Wider War Cynthia Chung A little over a day has passed since the original posting and I would like to add the analysis of Brian Berletic to the discussion which offers a very grounded view of the failures that led to the takeover of Syria, but as he stresses this is a battle lost in a greater war and the sovereignty of Syria is not something we should view as lost forever or to make the mistake of equating this battle lost for Syria as having lost the broader war. I have just finished watching an insightful interview by Alex Krainer on his thoughts as to how Syria could have fallen in a matter of days without what appears to be any significant resistance. Alex makes some interesting points as to how things may not appear to be as they seem and that this could all very well have been a trap with the plan to attrition the enemy, a new Afghanistan scenario except this time it is the Zionist/Anglo-American forces who have walked into the sinking sand rather than the Russians et al. Only time will tell, but I think Alex’s points are important since, if he is correct, it shows that things are not as insane or incompetent as they seem to be right now, at least concerning the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and thus all of this strategizing to be free from the Zionist/Anglo-American stranglehold over decades has not been for nought.

fe0914ed.jpg
Press TV at journalist event. UK abuses terrorism laws to suppress pro-Palestine movements As the Israeli genocide against the people of Palestine continues, several groups and individuals have taken direct action against the Israeli war machine in the UK. In August 2024, for example, dozens of activists from Palestine Action stormed the Bristol-based plant belonging to Elbit Systems, the largest weapons manufacturer in Israel, causing an estimated 1 million pounds worth of damage and reportedly resulting in major disruption to some of the most sensitive elements of the factory for months to come. In total, 21 people have since been arrested in relation to the factory raid, many of them under draconian UK anti-terrorism laws, sparking condemnation from human rights groups and observers across the world. As a result, the pro-Palestinian groups have held a meeting, under heavy security, in the western English city of Bristol to discuss the British government’s legal warfare strategy. Campaigners argue that the British government’s use of anti-terrorism legislation is not only intended to punish those disrupting the Israeli war machine, but also to discourage others from taking action against Israeli companies like Elbit Systems and others drenched in Palestinian and Lebanese blood. Professor David Miller is one of the foremost anti-Zionist academics in the UK. He’s been targeted by pro Israel lobby groups that led to his dismissal from the University of Bristol, an injustice, he successfully challenged in court. They’re trying to use any means that they can to attack the pro-Palestine movement. They’re using hate crime legislation, and they’re starting to use terrorism legislation. Yes, criminal damage, but they’re also using the terrorism legislation against journalists and saying that some journalists have been supporting proscribed organizations, which is plainly ridiculous, but they’re using the terrorism legislation, the Terrorism Act of 2000 and the Terrorism Act of 2006, in order to suppress the Palestine movement. They can’t find any other way of doing it, but they are using legislation which is plainly inappropriate. David Miller, Academic According to Professor Miller, the pro-Palestine movement is growing in the UK, and attempts to crush them will not be successful. It’s an intimidation tactic. What they’re hoping to do is to convict some people under the Terrorism Act and say, Look, this is what awaits you. If you take up a placard, a slogan, if you try and invade an arms factory, you will be put into jail. And they want to destroy the pro-Palestine movement, and of course, they’re not going to succeed. The outrage about the genocide is far too deeply entrenched in the UK, amongst public opinion. Most young people in this country now believe that Israel has no right to exist, and that’s a complete sea change from a year ago. David Miller, Academic Britain’s culpability in the historic and ongoing crimes of the Israeli regime means that many among the UK public feel duty bound to continue disrupting and struggling against the Israeli killing machines tentacles in Britain and beyond.

fe09151c.jpg fe09154b.jpg
John Mc Donnell on Gaza. People attacking churches – John McDonald every every week of last year virtually we’ve had a debate in this chamber or in the main chamber and questions asked and then we go home and then we watch on television the bodies of children being dug out of rubble body parts in some instances those white wrappings around around their bodies and every debate we’ve had we seem to have got virtually nowhere because the arms are still being sold because the f335 the very vehicle that’s dropping the bombs and firing the weapons and killing those children we’re still supplying the essential parts to it thank you Mrs Harris would the honorable member or was The Honorable member as shocked as I was to learn that contrary to to the UK’s trade in F35 Parts being untraceable as we were previously told it is in fact not only is it traceable but the US government i tracking it and the reason we don’t have that information is that that we haven’t even asked them joh McDonald one one of the frustrations and I’m careful of my language here but one of the frustrations in this debate as well is to be told the truth about what’s happening and what’s contributing to the murders that are taking place I think we’re unless we can stop this unless we can prevent the UK participating I think we’ll all be implicated I think history will judge us all for not doing enough to stop this I’m pleased that the petition has taken place and I’m pleased at the numbers I congratulate those people who organized it but the petition is a sense of the frustration that’s felt out there and the real depth of anger the demonstr I’ve been on virtually every National demonstration now and actually they’ve been peaceful but there’s a level of frustration now I don’t think we can contain anymore and in our own communities we’re alienating old sections of our own Community not about labor party or other political parties but from democracy itself people are saying you’re an MP you go to Parliament why aren’t you stopping this it’s no good you just keep on shouting on demonstrations why isn’t democracy ex being exercised here to stop this and I want to make just one point uh which is because of the lack of action by government yes petitions are taking place but other people are taking direct action and they’re being imprisoned it’s sub Judy for me to mention any individual Case Case chair and I won’t but Palestine action took direct action to close down an arms Factory that was supplying the goods the materials for the F35 and also the drones those people were arrested under counterterrorism P powers and they were detained under those cter ter they’re young people a lot of them young women some of them just starting out at University they did to be honestly they exercising their influence and power because we failed to exercise ours and now a number of them some are being in court and they be when they’re in front of a jury they usually win in the case but now a number of them will be in prison from last March until next November when their trial is listed and they’ll be on remark I remind The Honorable me member that it is Subud toy and we should not be talking about I’m careful and I’m not mentioning any names I’m asking I’m raising the issue of the process itself chair which is the use of C counterterrorism Powers against direct action groups and the last government even came forward with proposals and discussions about prescribing Palestine action as a terrorist organization I’m hoping the government isn’t even going anywhere near that but I tell you these people that are in prison at the moment why are they in remand at the moment why can’t they be tagged before their their trial comes up next November a number of them most probably will be proved Innocent but they’ll have served nearly two years in prison for what for trying to do what we’re failing to do preventing this government supplying the arms to a regime that’s killing children so I say to the government it’s time to act now all arms licenses need to be closed down and if it’s a matter of The Honorable gentleman says well it’s about defending Israel well let’s have a conversation with Israel itself about how you supervise that defense internationally rather than using that as an excuse to kill children I’ve had enough of coming back here every week as you can tell chair we need now action from this government

fe09156a.jpg
The Orthodox Christian church in Ukraine is being Nazified – Orthodox Church in Ukraine is being completely taken apart, yet world turns blind eye – Putin Police issue subpoenas to Kiev-Pechersk Lavra monks to appear for questioning Several dozens of subpoenas have been served by the evening of April 10 2023 MOSCOW, April 10. /TASS/. Law enforcement agents are conducting a sweeping operation to deliver subpoenas to monks and seminary students of the canonical Russian Orthodox Church on the premises of the Kiev-Pechersk Lavra to appear for questioning as part of an investigation into the desecration and destruction of sacred objects, the Union of Orthodox Journalists said on Monday. It said several dozens of subpoenas have been served by the evening of April 10. According to the journalists’ group, the investigation was started based on a complaint from the Kiev-Pechersk Lavra Museum, which had unilaterally terminated a lease agreement with the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. Ukrainian law stipulates a fine, community service or imprisonment for up to three years for the crime of desecrating or destroying sacred objects. The Ukrainian news outlet Strana reported earlier on Monday that the Ukrainian Security Service had summoned for an interrogation a woman that had vigorously defended the Ukrainian Orthodox Church near the Lavra. The woman tried to talk to rabble rousers, answered their questions and explained the position of the church and the parishioners. Whenever approached by rabble rousers, she always made video recordings of the encounters, as is recommended by the church. Kiev-Pechersk Lavra rector, Metropolitan Pavel, was charged on April 1 with inciting religious discord and justifying Russia’s actions. The court ruled on the same day to place him under house arrest for 60 days. Kiev-Pechersk Lavra controversy The situation around the Kiev-Pechersk Lavra – one of the first Russian monasteries and the oldest monastery in modern-day Ukraine – came to a head at the end of March. The government tore up its agreement with the canonical church for the lease of the Lavra and demanded that monks leave the monastery. UOC monks refused to comply with the unlawful demand and both sides took the matter to court. The Ukrainian cabinet on March 30 rescinded the cabinet’s decree of 2013 that transferred the right to use the Lavra to the UOC. The church plans to appeal to the UN, other international organizations and the Ukrainian Prosecutor General’s Office and file lawsuits over the cabinet’s unlawful decision. The head of the UOC Information and Education Department, Metropolitan Kliment of Nezhin and Priluki, has said that the lease agreement between the Kiev-Pechersk Lavra Museum and the canonical church can’t be terminated by Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky, the cabinet or any government agency without an appropriate court ruling.

fe091654.jpg
Complicit: senior figure in both Islam & Zionism, why isn’t King Charles’ govt ending this genocide? King Charles decides on war & peace, a Zionist/Islamic leader using genocide to gain power? Tim Cohen ‘Highly respected’ both in Islam and Judaism. Ingratiating himself to both while condemning ‘barbaric’ Hamas. Why has King Charles, who appoints army officers, civil servants, judges and all UK officials supporting Israel’s genocide in Gaza, been so silent on the horrors unfolding in the Holy Land? King Charles III: Five things the new British monarch said about Islam and Muslims – The king, who once studied Arabic to better understand the Quran, has long spoken about Islamic history and theology In 1996, the grand mufti of Cyprus, shockingly, accused Charles III – the new British king – of secretly being a Muslim. “Did you know that Prince Charles has converted to Islam. Yes, yes. He is a Muslim. I can’t say more. But it happened in Turkey. Oh, yes, he converted all right,” the late Nazim Al-Haqqani said. “When you get home check on how often he travels to Turkey. You’ll find that your future king is a Muslim.” Buckingham Palace simply replied: “Nonsense.” The 73-year-old, who is now the head of the Church of England, has made several speeches whilst king-in-waiting on theological and historical subjects related to Muslims and Islam. He even once revealed that he had been learning Arabic in order to understand the Quran better – a fact praised by Cambridge Central Mosque’s imam last week during a sermon. Middle East Eye takes a look at some of Charles III’s most significant references to Islam over the decades. In a 1996 speech entitled “A Sense of the Sacred: Building Bridges Between Islam and the West”, he suggested that an appreciation of Islamic views on natural order would “help us in the West to rethink, and for the better, our practical stewardship of man and his environment”. Charles elaborated on those views in a 2010 speech at the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies, which he has been a patron of since 1993. “From what I know of [Islam’s] core teachings and commentaries, the important principle we must keep in mind is that there are limits to the abundance of nature,” he said. “These are not arbitrary limits, they are the limits imposed by God and, as such, if my understanding of the Quran is correct, Muslims are commanded not to transgress them.” He later describes Islam as possessing “one of the greatest treasuries of accumulated wisdom and spiritual knowledge available to humanity” – a tradition he said was obscured by a drive towards “western materialism”. “Islam has always taught this and to ignore that lesson is to default on our contract with Creation.”

fe091693.jpg

Antidepressants making mentally ill ‘patients’ suicidal and homicidal. Katinka Blackford-Newman is an award winning BBC trained documentary film-maker who lives in London. Her interest in antidepressants began in 2012 when she nearly lost her life because of an adverse reaction to an antidepressant. She was hospitalised and prescribed more drugs which made her extremely ill.  Our film, Medicating Normal, began as I witnessed what I believed was the psychiatric unravelling of a dear family member. A Harvard graduate and star athlete, she had been diagnosed in her early twenties with “mental illness”. Her subsequent treatment resulted in a steady stream of doctors dispensing different diagnoses and an ever-increasing regimen of medications. As time passed, she was told by some doctors she would need medication for the rest of her life. Twenty-plus years later, she was taking a staggering 10 pills daily. Today, with the support of our family, she has a house, a steady boyfriend, and has just self-published a meaningful book of essays. In this groundbreaking work, Whitaker examines the current mental health profession’s drug-centered approach to treatment, concluding that it is actually creating a public health crisis. Scrupulously researching data from drug trials and studies, Whitaker draws a disturbing parallel between rising disability rates and increased usage of psychotropic drugs. Alarmed that Whitaker’s cautionary narrative was conspicuously missing from today’s public discourse on mental health, Wendy and I set out to verify and define the extent of the problem. We read every book and article we could find, interviewing more than one hundred individuals treated with psychiatric drugs and numerous credentialed researchers, neuroscientists, psychiatrists, and psychologists. What we learned became the basis for Medicating Normal. The film acknowledges that psychiatric drugs do help alleviate suffering for a segment of those who take them. However, it is estimated that of the 1 in 5 Americans taking such meds, 30% to 35% are gravely harmed by the very treatment meant to help them. Medicating Normal focuses on the predicament of this group – individuals facing trauma and stress who are drugged needlessly and made sicker as a result. Interviews with experts in the film reveal that significant numbers of these people will get better over time without medication. For over three years, we documented the journey of five individuals whose lives were profoundly impacted by the medication they were taking. Understanding the harm that has befallen them – especially in the context of the misleading science and marketing behind these drugs – compelled us to make this film. Our hope is that Medicating Normal will present one very important and predominantly untold story so that as a society we can begin a meaningful, informed nationwide discussion about what it means to be fully human and mentally well. Lynn Cunningham and Wendy Ractliffe

fe091700.jpg
Little Imber on the down, seven miles from any town! Gordon Lewis’ great aunt was born in this Salisbury Plain Wiltshire village which was taken over ‘temporarily’ by the army, in 1941. Gordon exposes a tragic WWII mistake and cover-up, where many training soldiers were killed. Also recounts a mass trespass in 1961 when, led by Amesbury councillor Austin Underwood, villagers tried to take their old homes back off the army.  Imber is currently an uninhabited village in part of the British Army’s training grounds on the Salisbury Plain in Wiltshire, seven miles north east of the town of Warminster. The entire civilian population was evicted in 1943 to provide an exercise area for American troops preparing for the invasion of Europe during the Second World War. After the war villagers were not allowed to return to their homes and the village remains under the control of the Ministry of Defence. The first documentary evidence of Imber’s existence comes from Saxon times, with a mention of the village in 967. Imber is also recorded in the Domesday Book, at which time it is believed to have had a population of around fifty. The village’s church of St Giles dates back to the 12th century and has notable wall-paintings from the 15th century. By the 14th century the population of the village had risen to around 250, and eventually peaked at 440 as recorded in the census of 1851, declining to around 150 by the time of Imber’s abandonment. Imber was always an isolated community, Salisbury Plain being relatively sparsely populated, and most of its residents were employed in agriculture or work that directly depended on it. The village had an elongated form like a linear village, and its main street followed the course of a stream known as Imber Dock. The only building to survive in a reasonable condition is the church, with the rest becoming derelict or demolished by the Army. In 1943 there was also a Baptist chapel (built in 1839, demolished in late 1970s), a post office, and a pub called the Bell Inn, which still stands; as does the manor house, Imber Court. Also still standing are a farmhouse, farm cottages, schoolroom and four “council house” type blocks built in 1938. In the late 19th century the War Office began buying land on Salisbury Plain, primarily to the east of Imber, and using it for manoeuvres. Beginning in the late 1920s farms around Imber were purchased, as well as the land on which the village itself sat. The pressures of agricultural depression, combined with the good prices offered by the military, encouraged the sale of land, with few being put off by the new conditions of their tenancy. This allowed the War Office to assume control and evict the residents if necessary. By the time of the Second World War, almost all of the land in and around Imber, with the exception of the church, vicarage, chapel, schoolroom and Bell Inn, belonged to the War Office. On 1 November 1943, with preparations for the Allied invasion of mainland Europe underway, the people of Imber were called to a meeting in the village schoolroom and given 47 days’ notice to leave their homes. Imber was to be used by US forces to practice street fighting. Many of the buildings in Imber suffered shell and explosion damage after the war when UK military operations began, and, additionally eroded by the weather, quickly fell into disrepair. Although the villagers had been told they could return in six months, this was never allowed. At the end of the war, efforts were made to restore Imber to its pre-war condition – although there was very little damage – but the decision was taken not to relinquish control. A public inquiry also found in favour of Imber’s continued military use,but it was decided that the church would be maintained, and would be open for worship on the Saturday closest to St Giles’s day each year – a practice that continues to this day.

fe09172f.jpg
Rev. John Papworth, Anglican vicar  – Who was the Shoplifting Vicar? Rev. John Papworth made the national news in 1997 when he was ticked off by the Church of England for preaching, to his congregation, that it was okay to steal from supermarkets if you were poor and hungry. Though much of the press treated his comments as ‘beyond the pale’ he struck a chord with many who are fed up with the supermarket consumer culture. John edits an excellent quarterly pamphlet, the ‘Fourth World Review’. Here are some extracts. Confessions of a Shop-Lifting Vicar The saga of my clerical status within the Anglican Communion continues like a minor soap opera. The media furore featuring a ‘shop-lifting vicar’ made me world famous for five minutes and prompted the Archdeacon of Charing Cross to complain testily on the phone that I had ‘disrupted’ his entire weekend. You may well ask, as I did myself, ‘What is an archdeacon?’ And for that matter why have one attached to a railway station? Being very little acquainted with the niceties of clerical ranking in an ecclesiastical bureaucracy, unfortunately for me as it proved, I later gathered that the Venerable Dr W.M Jacob was effectively my ecclesiastical boss. I was also to discover in due course just why he is known as the archdeacon of arch-deviousness. After some deft, bureaucratic sleight-of-hand in declaring that since I was too late in applying for a licence to officiate, (an application which had never been required in my 14 years of unpaid service to the diocese), he would therefore not recommend me for one to the bishop, he has dallied me on a string. Letters of appeal tended to be sidetracked or to go unanswered until, just recently, a local press hack, scenting a story from the good man’s announcement that he would never, ever recommend me for a licence to officiate, enquired the reason for his ruling. This provoked a sudden volte-face. He denied making any such ruling but then proceeded to spell out the rule book in ways which would ensure, if he was around, that I would be kept out of action just as effectively. It would be a mistake to read overmuch personal animus in all this. In Trollope’s expansive, empire-building, and generally booming Victorian times a venerable archdeacon could have lived a fat, comfortable life and feel somehow he was a friend and ally of contemporary history. Today the chickens of that era have come home to roost with a vengeance. Some sort of moral lead is a yawning gulf in the world scene as the elements of the global crisis multiply and coagulate in ways suggesting that unless that lead in soon forthcoming the ship may well founder altogether. I am told that the musical needs of St Peter’s church in Rome were once served by a castrata choir; sometimes it seems to me the Anglican Church is now served by an ecclesiastical castrata. Absolutely nothing appears able to shake the moribund complacency of those who run it and the current leadership expresses all too clearly the price it is paying for generations of intellectual dishonesty. There is no open forthright debate on the challenge to its core beliefs mounted by modern astronomy, geology, biology and psychology; there is instead a rampant fever of spiritual cowardice running through its veins which leads it to pretend that the explosion of man’s understanding of his place in the universe has no relevance to its concerns and that the spiritual crisis generating the social and environmental disasters, now threatening to edge man off the page of history altogether, are things happening on another planet and of which it need have no more regard than for the craters on the moon. People of first-rate calibre have clearly abandoned it in droves and it appears now not to possess a single voice able or willing to speak with authority to challenge the diabolic forces which are wreaking the planet, our social structures and our prospects of progress. The third-raters who now infest it are not remotely members of a life-force which might give direction, inspiration, coherence or any kind of elevated moral sense to society at large; they are leeches in a sepulchre gorging on a corpse, ceasing to do so only to belch spite or to lapse into a coma of satiation.


Radio4All download pages
COMPLETE SHOW AND FULL INTERVIEWS [right click to download]
#1 – Complete 4hr show – [right click to download]
~Full interviews with…
#2 – Farmers Protest Wed11Dec24 Islington Free News Media David Lear – 00:09:00
#3 – Liz Webster Save British Farming on inheritance tax, Blackrock, war on family farmers – 00:30:00
#4 – Ex-PM chief adviser Dominic Cummings: is A.I. already in control of Britain – 01:45:00
#5 – New ‘oily’ British ambassador to Washington Peter Mandelson Trump is a dangerous racist – 00:20:00
#6 – Hamish de Bretton Gordon and Steve Rosenberg on Kiev NATO MI6 assassination of Russian general Igor Kirillov killing – 00:07:00
#7 – Richard Dearlove ex MI6 DG on Gaza Iran Chagos islands and his Russia ‘war’ – 00:10:00
#8 – Russian president Vladimir Putin Dec 2024 extended press conference – 04:20:00
#9 – Alex Krainer_ Russia warning to the West and false flag nuke in London – 00:50:00
#10 – Message to the People of Gaza spiritual solidarity from a Jewish Rabbi – 00:05:00
#11 – King Charles decides on peace and war Zionist and Islamic credentials make him ideal peacemaker but is he secretly backing Gaza genocide? Charles could end Gaza genocide tomorrow. Tim Cohen – 00:15:00
#12 – Antidepressant danger and abuse with filmmaker Katinka Blackford-Newman – 01:00:00
#13 – The Shoplifting Vicar, Rev. John Papworth, The Turbulent Priest – 00:12:00

Tony’s paperback and eBooks Traitors Of Arnhem, Siege Of Heaven; Siege Of Heaven Reader – all available for donation, or to buy, via www.bilderberg.org


Tony, Dave and Martin’s NOT The BCfm Politics show CANCELLED/EVICTED in a no fault, no appeal, no notice eviction from People’s Republic of Stokes Croft (PRSC) arts centre – email from Chloe Slater and Keith Cowling explaining that: ‘Transphobic’ leaflets had been left in the building by a recent guest making Transsexual users of the building feel ‘offended’ and ‘unsafe’. Please let us know when you or Dave would like to come and retrieve your equipment and drop off your keys. Kind regards PRSC Directors (Keith Cowling, chair) PRSC / Stokes Croft China 17-35 Jamaica St Bristol BS2 8JP.

BCfm’s weekly Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling with Irish Republican Labour activist Martin Summers was forced off FM, now online only by station manager Pat Hart, ‘rested due to the pandemic’ on 24 March 2020. Bristol Community FM (BCfm) charity ‘CEO’ Patrick Hart is a longtime personal friend of Bristol’s all-powerful right-wing ‘Labour’ mayor Marvin Rees. Now on Internet only NOT The BCfm Politics Show is available 17:00-c. 21:00 live on Fridays. Pat Hart replaced us with an inane student show repeating MSM stories called The Bristol Agenda. If you’d like to share your views on his deliberate dumbing-down and pro-Covid jab mismanagement you can contact UK broadcasting regulator Ofcom or BCfm board chair and the ‘Don’ himself, here.

February 2019 Ofcom complaint result: UKLFI exposed as creation of Israeli foreign ministry – Bristol Post article: BCfm cleared after being reported to Ofcom for anti-semitic conspiracy theories
Weekly politics show page http://www.thisweek.org.uk
Radio stream live 5pm Fridays and repeated 11am/pm UK time http://www.talkradio.org.uk
Also on: NOT The BCfm Politics Show App https://apkpure.com/not-the-bcfm-politics-show/com.sweetsmile.bottom_navigation_flutter

NB please reply with any unsubscribe request in the email body, leaving the subject line intact, if you do not wish to recieve further emails - thanks
And it came to pass, as he sat at meat with them, he took bread, and blessed it, and brake, and gave to them. 31 And their eyes were opened, and they knew him; and he vanished out of their sight.  http://biblehub.com/kjv/luke/24.htm
'Capitalism is institutionalised bribery' TG - Cancelled -> https://www.youtube.com/user/PublicEnquiry/videos

Albert Pike’s 1871 WWIII plan to cancel God – Accelerationist multicrisis: my schoolfriend ‘Nazi Nick’s Dark Enlightenment ‘death trip’ is designed to discredit all democracy
Essentials: Michael Hudson | Blackrock/Vanguard | Tony on Brexit & The Traitors of Arnhem | Evolution | War between God & Lucifer | Plan for three World Wars | Armageddonists I have known: Nick Land (1975-8) | George Monbiot (1995-8) | Manna for the Revelation Generation: CONSPIRACY CLASSICS, longer interviews/lectures

"And I think, in the end, that is the best definition of journalism I have heard; to challenge authority - all authority - especially so when governments and politicians take us to war, when they have decided that they will kill and others will die. " --Robert Fisk
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMn9GM4atN3t7AHJBbHMR0Q/videos
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://www.thisweek.org.uk
http://www.911forum.org.uk
http://www.tlio.org.uk
Tony's free watermarked books www.bilderberg.org - My ebooks https://payhip.com/TonyGosling
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvPbHiqhLtpNWA_cg_1NULw
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMn9GM4atN3t7AHJBbHMR0Q
https://www.twitter.com/TonyGosling
https://www.facebook.com/tony.gosling.16
You can donate to support Tony's work here http://www.bilderberg.org/bcfm.htm
Or buy Tony's three ebooks for £10-£15 here https://payhip.com/TonyGosling or paperback here https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/254963338161
TG mobile +44 7786 952037
For updates and info, contact scott at planttrees dot org.