Plant Trees SF Events 2004 Archive: 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Event

 
BUSH CALLS FOR "NEW WORLD ORDER / PRE-EMPTIVE STRIKES"

http://www.freepressinternational.com/bushnwo_12112004_87493029871647684.html

   What I want to know is how come this was NOT COVERED in any Television
News Media reports.

   Did you see a T.V. news report on this statement Bush made?

   If not, why was it not covered? I think I know why. If had been more
widely covered, then all of the American public would be on to the real
agenda of the Bush administration.

   In my opinion, Bush's agenda is to create a police-state-based New World
Order, as he has said himself, "through pre-emptive action against enemies
of democracy." The passing of the Patriot Act II was only the beginning of
this agenda.

   So how many more wars, like the one in Iraq, are planned for our nations
future? How many "dissidents" among the American public will be considered
"enemies of democracy" for opposing Bush's plans? How many of our own
citizens will be taken away in "pre-emptive action against enemies of
democracy?"

   That, is what I'm pondering now.

   ==============================================================

   Free Press International
   12.11.2004

http://www.freepressinternational.com/bushnwo_12112004_87493029871647684.html

On December 2, 2004 while President Bush was in Canada, he challenged
international leaders to create a 'new world order' through pre-emptive
strikes against what he calls, 'enemies of democracy'.

The Washington Post (WP) wrote, "President Bush yesterday challenged
international leaders to create a new world order, declaring pre-September
11 multilateralism outmoded and asserting that freedom from terrorism will
come only through pre-emptive action against enemies of democracy".

The title of the WP story is, "Bush Calls For New World Order; Strikes
Against Enemies of Democracy".

Did you hear the television networks report on Bush's call for a new world
order with pre-emptive strikes? 
=====================================
Bush Calls for Global Cooperation

WASHINGTON TIMES | December 2, 2004
By Joseph Curl

http://www.infowars.com/articles/us/bush_calls_for_nwo.htm

HALIFAX, Nova Scotia - President Bush yesterday challenged international
leaders to create a new world order, declaring pre-September 11
multilateralism outmoded and asserting that freedom from terrorism will come
only through pre-emptive action against enemies of democracy.
   In his first major foreign-policy speech since his re-election, the
president set out an expansive second-term agenda with three distinct goals:
reforming multilateral institutions, prosecuting the war on terrorism and
spreading democracy in the Middle East.

   But even as Mr. Bush urged a new effort by free nations to join forces,
he criticized the multilateral process that splintered as his administration
moved toward war in the absence of action by the United Nations against
former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.
   "The success of multilateralism is measured not merely by following a
process, but by achieving results," Mr. Bush said. "The objective of the
U.N. and other institutions must be collective security, not endless
debate."
   The president, who was seated near Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin,
did not bring up the United States' disagreement with Canada over the
U.S.-led Iraq war or chastise other nations that opposed the pre-emptive
strike on Saddam, such as France, Germany or Russia.
   But one day after declaring in Ottawa that Americans on Election Day had
endorsed the Bush administration's foreign policy and its doctrine - which
calls for pre-emptive action against states that harbor or aid terrorists -
the president had a clear message for the rest of the world.
    "Defense alone is not a sufficient strategy," he said. "There is only
one way to deal with enemies who plot in secret and set out to murder the
innocent and the unsuspecting: We must take the fight to them."
   The president declared that multilateralism has, of late, resulted in
little action. Although he vowed to make an effort to build coalitions with
foreign powers, he said those efforts must be geared toward results.
   "My country is determined to work as far as possible within the
framework of international organizations, and we're hoping that other
nations will work with us to make those institutions more relevant and more
effective in meeting the unique threats of our time," he said.
   While applauding Canada's expansive military role in the world, with its
peacekeeping troops in Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Haiti, Sudan, Cyprus
and the Middle East, Mr. Bush recalled Canada's pre-emptive entry into World
War II, noting, "Some Canadians argued that Canada had not been attacked and
had no interest in fighting a distant war."
   The Canadian prime minister echoed Mr. Bush's view of the post-September
11 world, saying the terrorist attacks on America "have redefined many
realities in the world and on our own continent."
   "We're in a war against terrorism, and we are in it together, Americans
and Canadians. ... Together we have come to realize that the world is indeed
smaller since 9/11. It's more complex, perilous, more challenging," Mr.
Martin said.
   Both leaders called for renewed efforts in prosecuting the war on
terrorism.
   "In the new era the threat is different, but our duties are the same.
Our enemies have declared their intentions - and so have we. Peaceful
nations must keep the peace by going after the terrorists," Mr. Bush said.
   He also called on all free nations to become more involved in spreading
democracy in the Middle East.
   "By taking the side of reformers and democrats in the Middle East, we
will gain allies in the war on terror and isolate the ideology of murder and
help to defeat the despair and hopelessness that feeds terror. The world
will become a much safer place as democracy advances," Mr. Bush said.
   But again, he urged all parties to avoid the endless debate over the
decades-old issue, dismissing past efforts to accept small compromises over
borders and settlement sites.
   "This approach has been tried before without success," he said. "The
Palestinian people deserve a peaceful government that truly serves their
interests, and the Israeli people need a true partner in peace."
   The president caused a bit of a stir when he mentioned the U.S.
missile-defense program, which many Canadians oppose. The first U.S. missile
bases in the shield have been set up in Alaska and California - and with
Canada in between, the question of whether Canada will help out could become
a sensitive point.
   Mr. Martin told reporters after Mr. Bush had left that whatever his
government decides, it "will be in Canada's interests. We are a sovereign
nation, and we will make our own decisions on our airspace," he said, but
added, "We are opposed to the weaponization of space."
   During his speech, Mr. Bush was conciliatory toward Canada and its prime
minister, who replaced Jean Chretien, a vehement opponent to the war in
Iraq.
   He said that because the United States and Canada are neighbors that are
engaged in "more multilateral institutions than perhaps any two nations on
Earth" and conduct $1 billion in trade each day, "when frustrations are
vented, we must not take it personally."
   Mr. Bush visited Halifax because on September 11, 2001, about 33,000
passengers on airplanes bound for U.S. airports were diverted to Canadian
provinces, including Nova Scotia.
   "You opened your homes and your churches to strangers, you brought food,
you set up clinics, you arranged for calls to their loved ones, and you
asked for nothing in return," the president said. "Thank you for your
kindness to America in an hour of need."
    Mr. Martin replied, "Well, Mr. President, that's what neighbors do."
For updates and info, contact scott at planttrees dot org.