Plant Trees SF Events 2004 Archive: 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Event

 
The flyer is big, about 470K.  So I put it on a server:
http://hopoo.dyndns.org/911/flyer.pdf

Here is the plain text of it (more or less):

Bush lied to you about Iraq's weapons of mass
destruction1 - to get our troops near the oil.2
Did he ALSO lie to you about Sept. 11 - to get our
troops near the planned pipeline routes in
Afghanistan?3
Both 'wars' - against Afghanistan and Iraq - were
planned well before 9/11!4
Bush told us Islamic terrorists
committed the 9/11 attacks.
Should we take his word for it?
He hasn't shown us any proof.
Airports have extensive, sophisticated surveillance systems yet we’ve
never been shown any video footage of a hijacker boarding any of the
doomed flights - which left from Massachusetts, New Jersey and
Washington D.C. All we've been shown is Mohammed Atta in an
airport in MAINE.5
The passenger lists don’t contain a single hijacker or Arab name.6
Many of the named ‘hijackers’ are still alive.7
At least seven of them were trained on our OWN military bases!8
The 'pilots' Bush said did this - who flunked out of their flight schools -
were way too inexperienced to carry off such a scheme, especially the
fancy fighter-jet maneuver just before hitting the Pentagon, a move
even highly trained military pilots have said is EXTREMELY difficult in
any circumstance and considered virtually impossible in a commercial
jetliner.9
Why should we believe him?
Is it possible that the "Islamic terrorists did it" explanation is just a
cover
story for what really happened on 9/11, an excuse so we could invade
Islamic countries, then and in the future???
Think about that for a minute.
Bush told us the Twin Towers fell because the planes hit them. But each
collapse looked distinctly like a controlled demolition - the process by
which engineers PURPOSELY demolish buildings they want to replace.
Remember how very fast, and how straight down they fell, neither toppling
to the left or the right?
They say the buildings’ steel was weakened by burning jet fuel, but it’s
a scientific fact that jet fuel doesn’t burn anywhere near hot enough to
weaken steel.10 Then they carted off the remnants of the steel before
anyone could examine the evidence, and wouldn't let fire investigators
near the site.11 A real investigation of the towers’ collapses was never
conducted.12
About seven hours later, a THIRD World Trade Center building - WTC 7
- ALSO collapsed in a controlled-demolition-like manner.13 Only trouble
is, WTC 7 wasn't hit by a plane AT ALL, the falling debris was too far
away from the larger towers to have caused WTC 7 to fall, and the fire
in WTC 7, on just a few floors of the building, wasn't sufficient to make
it collapse.14 This is the first time in history that it has ever been
claimed
that fires caused steel buildings to fall.15
It doesn't add up...and that’s just scraping the surface.
The Kean Commission SAYS it's investigating the 9-11 attacks, but it's
NOT. It just takes Bush at his word, that it was Islamic terrorists who
committed the 9/11 attacks. It is simply investigating why we didn’t protect
ourselves better from these Islamic terrorists - even though we
have no proof that it was Islamic terrorists in the first place! The Kean
Commission is just like the Warren (JFK) Commission was, PART of the
coverup. (This is very similar to the hand picked Commission that Bush
has just set up to "investigate" why there are no weapons of mass
destruction in Iraq like he said there were.16)
Do you believe everything Bush tells you? If not, and you want to dig
deeper, visit http://www.wtc7.net and http://www.physics911.org on the
internet. If you don’t have a computer at home, you can use one at any
public library for free - they’ll even show you how to get to these ‘sites’.
If you'd rather do your reading on the train, you can get the full scoop
about the 9/11 coverup in the newly released book "The New Pearl
Harbor" by David Ray Griffen.
For the 9/11 families
FOR THE OVER 3,000 PEOPLE WHO DIED THAT DAY
for all Americans
for the people in the countries we are attacking
SHOULDN’T WE GET THE TRUTH?
Remember, by sustaining the lie that it was Islamic terrorists who
attacked us, Bush - and all future Presidents - have an excuse for
the WAR THAT WILL NOT END IN OUR LIFETIMES, this endless war
on "terror"!
We need your help.
Join the worldwide 911 Truth Movement.
The September 11th Attacks
TOO MUCH IS AT STAKE TO
TAKE HIS WORD FOR IT
212-714-7147, http://www.ny911truth.org , email info@ny911truth.org
To join other New Yorkers who are working to stop the 9/11 coverup, here
is how you can reach us:
SEE BACK FOR SOURCES
[1] US News and World Report, June 9, 2003, ‘Truth and Consequences’
p. 14-18.
[2] NY Newsday, Jan. 10, 2003, ‘Plan: Tap Iraq's Oil.’
[3] BBC News, May 13, 2002, ‘Afghanistan Plans Gas Pipeline.’
[4] BBC News, Sept. 18, 2001, ‘US ‘Planned Attack on Taleban’;
Sunday Herald, Sept. 15, 2003, ‘Bush Planned Iraq 'Regime Change'
Before Becoming President.’
[5] Agents "examined footage from dozens of cameras at the three airports
where the terrorists boarded the aircraft" Los Angeles Times, Sept. 13,
2001, ’Investigators Identify 50 Terrorists Tied to Plot’;
Then, two weeks later, it is alleged that one of the three airports,
didn’t have
videotape surveillance at all: "Logan International Airport is missing a
basic tool found not only in virtually every other airport, but in most
7-Elevens." Boston Herald, Sept.29, 2001, ‘Logan Lacks Video
Cameras’;
The only video we've been shown on television is Mohammed Atta in a
different airport, one in Maine: Boston Globe, Sept. 6, 2002, "Company
Helps 9/11 Probe’;
Tech Review, Dec. 2001, ‘Recognizing the Enemy.’
[6] Check for yourself, and you’ll see. The passenger lists are located on
CNN’s website:
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA11.victims.html
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA77.victims.html
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua175.victims.html
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua93.victims.html
[7] BBC News, Sept. 23, 2001, ‘Hijack 'Suspects' Alive and Well.’
[8] Newsweek, Sept. 15, 2001, ‘Alleged Hijackers May Have Trained at U.S.
Bases - The Pentagon Has Turned Over Military Records on Five Men
to the FBI.’
Washington Post, Sept. 16, 2001, ‘Reconstructing the Hijackers’
Last Days.’
[9] "The speed, the maneuverability, the way that he turned, we all thought
in the radar room, all of us experienced air traffic controllers, that
that was a military plane," says O'Brien. ABC News, Oct. 24, 2001, ‘Air
Traffic Controllers Recall Sept. 11’
"I'm still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon,"
the former employee said. "He could not fly at all." CBS News,
Sept. 21, 2001, ‘Primary Target’
Cox News, Oct. 21, 2001, ‘Hijackers Had a Tough Time with
Flying Lessons’;
New York Times, May 4, 2002, ‘A Trainee Noted for Incompetence’.
[10]Journal of Metals, ‘Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science,
Engineering, and Speculation’ by Massachusetts Institute of Technology
professor Thomas Eagar, JOM, 53(12)(2001), pp. 8-11.
[11]"The lack of authority of investigators to impound pieces of steel for
examination before they were recycled led to the loss of important
pieces of evidence." U.S. House Of Representatives, Committee On
Science, Hearing Charter, Mar. 6, 2002, ‘Learning from
9/11: Understanding the Collapse of the World Trade Center.’
"The Giuliani administration started to send World Trade Center steel off
to recycling yards before investigators could examine it to
determine whether it might hold crucial clues as to why the buildings
fell. The full investigative team set up by FEMA was not allowed to
enter ground zero to collect other potentially critical evidence." New
York Times, Mar. 7, 2002, 'Mismanagement Muddled Collapse
Inquiry, House Panel Says’.
[12]The New York Daily News, (Jan. 4, 2002, ‘Firefighter Mag Raps 9/11
Probe’): describes Fire Engineering Magazine as a "125-year-old fires
monthly that frequently publishes technical studies of major fires" and
indicates it’s a "respected firefighting trade magazine with ties to the
city Fire Department. The magazine’s editor has written that: "Fire
Engineering has good reason to believe that the "official investigation"
blessed by FEMA and run by the American Society of Civil Engineers is
a half-baked farce that may already have been commandeered by
political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of
full disclosure. Except for the marginal benefit obtained from a threeday,
visual walk-through of evidence sites conducted by ASCE
investigation committee members - described by one close source as a
"tourist trip" - no one's checking the evidence for anything." ‘$elling Out
the Investigation’, Jan. 2002, by Bill Manning, Fire
Engineering Magazine.
[13]You can see videotape of this collapse at http://www.wtc7.net
[14]Even the government commissioned FEMA investigation admitted "the
specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to
collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on
the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis
has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research,
investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue." FEMA’s
‘World Trade Center Building Performance Study’, May 2002,
Chapter Five, p. 31.
[15]"The World Trade Center disaster was . . . the first total collapse of
a highrise
during a fire in United States history." Fire Engineering
Magazine, Jan. 2002, ‘WTC "INVESTIGATION"?: A CALL TO ACTION’,
by Editor Bill Manning.
[16]New York Times, Feb. 3, 2004, ‘Intelligence: Commission to Decide Itself
on Depth of Its Investigation.’
SOURCES
212-714-7147, http://www.ny911truth.org , email info@ny911truth.org
To join other New Yorkers who are working to stop the 9/11 coverup, here
is how you can reach us:
For updates and info, contact scott at planttrees dot org.