Plant Trees SF Events 2004 Archive: 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Event

 
Pollution Triggers Bizarre Behaviour in Animals

http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/090904G.shtml

     By Andy Coghlan
     NewScientist.com
     Wednesday 01 September 2004

     Hyperactive fish, stupid frogs, fearless mice and seagulls that fall 
over. It sounds like a weird animal circus, but this is no freak show. 
Animals around the world are increasingly behaving in bizarre ways, and the 
cause is environmental pollution.

     The chemicals to blame are known as endocrine disruptors, and range 
from heavy metals such as lead to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and 
additives such as bisphenol A.

     For decades, biologists have known that these chemicals can alter the 
behavior of wild animals. And in recent years it has become clear that 
pollutants can cause gender-bending effects by altering animals' 
physiology, particularly their sexual organs.

     But now two major reviews have revealed that the chemicals are having 
a much greater impact on animal behavior than anyone suspected. Low 
concentrations of these pollutants are changing both the social and mating 
behaviors of a raft of species. This potentially poses a far greater threat 
to survival than, for example, falling sperm counts caused by higher 
chemical concentrations.

     Snails and Quails
     The two research teams have independently collected evidence revealing 
the effects on egrets and gulls, snails, quails, rats and macaques, 
minnows, mosquito fish, falcons and frogs. Behaviors altered include mating 
and parenting, nest building, learning, predator avoidance, foraging, 
activity levels and even balance.

     In one study, for instance, male starlings exposed to dicrotophos 
insecticide decreased their singing, displaying, flying and foraging 
activities by 50%. And newts exposed to low levels of the pesticide 
endosulfan found it harder to sniff out the attractive pheromones of 
potential mates.

     Researchers have also shown that increasing numbers of male western 
gulls hatched from eggs exposed to DDT attempt to mate with each other. In 
recent years, scientists have also found that lead affects the balance of 
gulls, while atrazine makes goldfish hyperactive and the chemical TCDD 
makes the play behavior in macaques rougher.

     Despite this wealth of evidence, these effects have gone largely 
unnoticed by toxicologists, says Ethan Clotfelter of Amherst College in 
Massachusetts, lead author of one of the reviews, published in August 2004 
in Animal Behavior (vol 68, p 465).

     Missing a Trick
     Not only are we failing to acknowledge the scale of the problem caused 
by endocrine disruptors, but toxicologists may be missing a trick: changes 
in animal behavior could be an early warning that certain chemicals are 
harmful. "You might see behavioral effects long before you see a population 
crash," Clotfelter says.

     Dustin Penn and Sarah Zala of the Konrad Lorenz Institute of 
Comparative Ethology at the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna agree. 
They have just published a second review of the effects of endocrine 
disruptors in the same journal (DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.01.005). "The 
most important point is the incredible amount of evidence that this is a 
widespread problem," Penn says.

     Both research groups say that biologists must wake up to the fact that 
endocrine disruptors might explain bizarre behavior in wild animals. And 
both reviews reveal that different concentrations of chemicals can have 
unexpected effects.

     Male mice exposed to low doses of some pesticides increase their 
scent-marking behavior, for instance, but decrease it when exposed to 
higher concentrations.

     Damaging Doses
     "Pollutants that have been considered safe when tested at medium doses 
could have damaging effects at lower doses," Penn and Zala warn in their 
review. And conversely, toxicologists might exaggerate the risks posed by 
higher doses.

     Other behavioral biologists back the authors' call for biologists and 
toxicologists to work more closely to determine the scale of the problem. 
"It's been decades since the first evidence appeared that chemicals in the 
environment can influence behavior," says John McCarty of the University of 
Nebraska in Omaha, who researches the impact of pollutants on birds.

     "It seems to me that this body of evidence was pushed to the 
background while most environmental scientists and regulators focused on 
mortality and cancer rates [caused by endocrine disruptors and other 
pollutants]."

     The US Environmental Protection Agency says it cannot provide a 
detailed comment on the research, but promises it will investigate further. 
"We'll review these two scientific articles as we continue to develop an 
endocrine screening and testing program," a spokeswoman told New Scientist.

     Geoff Brighty, ecosystems science manager at the UK Environment 
Agency, agrees that studying the effects of chemicals on animal behavior 
should be given a higher priority. "It is becoming recognized that behavior 
is important to look at to make sure a chemical is safe, and we ignore it 
at our peril."
For updates and info, contact scott at planttrees dot org.