Legion of Little Helpers in the Gut Keeps Us Alive - however: Genetically Engineered Crops May Produce Herbicide Inside Our Intestines
Once again, the promise of patent-based profits from GMOs (1)
contradicts healthfulness (2).*
** * * **
Genetically Engineered Crops May Produce Herbicide Inside Our Intestines*
By Jeffrey M. Smith
Spilling the Beans/Institute for Responsible Technology
http://www.seedsofdeception.com/GMFree/EducationalMaterials/SignUpforNewsletter/index.cfm
<http://www.seedsofdeception.com/GMFree/EducationalMaterials/SignUpforNewsletter/index.cfm>
http://www.organicconsumers.org/2006/article_637.cfm
<http://www.organicconsumers.org/2006/article_637.cfm>
* * * *
*Legion of Little Helpers in the Gut Keeps Us Alive*
By Rick Weiss
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, June 5, 2006; A06
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/04/AR2006060400603.html
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/04/AR2006060400603.html>
So you think you are the self-reliant type.
A rugged individualist.
Well, give it up. You'd be nothing without the trillions of microbial
minions toiling in your large intestine, performing crucial
physiological functions that your highfalutin human cells wouldn't have
a clue how to do.
That's one of the humbling truths emerging from the most thorough census
yet of the bacterial tenants homesteading in our bodies. The new view,
made possible by cutting-edge DNA screening methods, shows that the
vaunted human genome -- all the genes in our cells -- is but a fraction
of what it takes to make a human.
In fact, it's time to stop thinking of yourself as a single living thing
at all, say the scientists behind the new work. Better to see yourself
as a "super-organism," they say: a hybrid creature consisting of about
10 percent human cells and 90 percent bacterial cells.
"The numbers might strike fear into people, but the overall concept is
one we have to understand and adjust to," said Steven Gill, a microbial
geneticist who helped lead the study at the Institute for Genomic
Research in Rockville.
A better understanding of the bacteria colonizing our bodies could have
far-reaching medical implications. In the not-too-distant future, Gill
and others predicted, doctors will test for subtle changes in the
numbers and kinds of microbes in people's guts as early indicators of
disease. Doctors may prescribe live bacterial supplements to bring
certain physiological measures back into normal range. And drug
companies will invent compounds that mimic or amplify the actions of
helpful bacteria.
"These microbes are master physiological chemists," said Jeffrey I.
Gordon of Washington University in St. Louis, another team member.
"Understanding their biosynthetic capabilities and following the
pathways by which they operate could be the starting point for a
21st-century pharmacopoeia."
Scientists have long recognized that the number of human cells in the
body is dwarfed by the 100 trillion or so bacteria living in and on it.
It's a daunting reality obscured by the fact that human cells are much
bigger than bacterial cells. For all their numbers, bacteria account for
only about three pounds of the average person's weight.
Just how important those three pounds are, however, has been difficult
to appreciate until now. Most bacteria are too finicky to grow in
laboratory dishes. As a result, little was known about who these
majority shareholders really are and what, exactly, they are doing to
and for us.
The new study, described in last week's issue of the journal Science,
took a novel approach. Rather than struggling to grow the body's myriad
microbes and testing their ability to perform various biochemical
reactions -- the methods scientists traditionally use to classify
bacteria -- the team used tiny molecular probes resembling DNA Velcro to
retrieve tens of thousands of snippets of bacterial DNA from smidgeons
of the intestinal output of two volunteers.
By comparing the DNA sequences of those snippets with those of
previously studied bacteria, the team was able to sort many of the
invisible bugs into known families.
Hundreds of others, it became clear, belong to microbial families
unknown to science until now.
But the team members went further. By comparing the genetic puzzle
pieces with similar sequences stored in databases, they were able to
determine what biological functions many of these microbes are
performing in the gut. And, as it turns out, no small number of those
functions are crucial to human survival.
Some of the bacteria have the genetic machinery to make essential
vitamins that are not found in the diet and that human cells can barely
manufacture, including several B vitamins. Others make enzymes that can
break the chemical bonds in plant fibers, or polysaccharides, where a
plant's nutritional energy is stored.
"We have very few of those linkage-busting enzymes encoded in our own
genome, but these microbial genomes have a whole arsenal of gene
products to degrade plant polysaccharides to energy," Gordon said.
Some bacteria in the gut break down flavonoids and other chemicals made
by plants that could cause cancer or other illnesses if they were not
neutralized in the intestines.
Others have the genetic capacity to scavenge hydrogen gas from the gut
-- a byproduct of digestion that can kill helpful bacteria -- andconvert it into methane. That makes the intestines a more biologically
friendly place, while contributing in sometimes embarrassing moments to
Earth's accumulation of greenhouse gases.
And in one especially touching example, bacteria in the gut make
generous quantities of an enzyme that facilitates the production of
butyryl coenzyme A, a fatty acid that is a favorite food of the cells
that line the colon.
"We provide them a great place to live," study author David A. Relman of
Stanford University said of the bacterial cells, "and they are feeding
the lining of our gut."
The new work does not purport to be a complete survey of all microbes in
the human gut. And it did not even take a stab at the body's other
pockets of microbial diversity -- primarily the nose and mouth, the
vagina, and the skin. But it demonstrates that the DNA-based approach
has the potential to reveal at last the metabolic details of our many
mini-mes, said Claire M. Fraser-Liggett, president and director of the
Institute for Genomic Research.
With the technology improving and getting cheaper, she said, it won't be
long before it is easy to monitor a person's microbial changes from day
to day -- or compare bacterial population structures among individuals
who have different diets or health histories.
"One question we need to tackle is: Is there such a thing as a core
microbiome, a set of organisms or bacterial genes you find in most or
all individuals?" Fraser-Liggett said. "It may be that microbes are very
stable and diet doesn't play a huge role. Or it may be that this is a
snapshot in time reflecting something they ate in their last meal."
With that kind of information in hand, doctors could think about
prescribing particular "probiotic" foods or supplements to change a
patient's microbiome in healthful ways, or adjusting a patient's diet to
make a better fit with the bugs that the patient is saddled with.
"To ignore our microbial side would be to ignore an important
contributor to our health and our biology," Gordon said.
Edward DeLong, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
who has used similar techniques to study marine microbial diversity,
said he was not completely comfortable with the idea that people are
super-organisms. "I'm not sure where the super-organism ends and the
environment begins," he said.
But he said he appreciated the focus on the positive side of bacteria.
"We typically think of microbes as being associated with human disease,"
DeLong said. "But they are always with us and are associated most of the
time with human health."
/Researcher Meg Smith contributed to this report./
© 2006 The Washington Post Company
The material in this post is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for research
and educational purposes. For more information go to:
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html
http://oregon.uoregon.edu/~csundt/documents.htm
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this email
for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain
permission from the copyright owner.
This is a private, confidential list. The right to circulate any
information posted is retained solely by the author of that information. |