so just a quick look in the news for martial law in the US with
URLs .. please line up:
Martial Law - Drills, Drills, & More Drills
By Nancy Levant
January 23, 2006
In spite of the fact that monkeys continue to cover their eyes, ears,
and mouths, they are still glued to their TV sets, and you can bet
these Darwinian primates are getting nervous along with the rest of
us. Martial law is being heavily practiced in the United States.
It has now been decided that being forced to show your bags, purses,
and ID's upon command is not unconstitutional. You can be arrested,
as an American citizen, for failure to do so. The line between
police, military, FEMA, eco-dictators, and Homeland Security
personnel has blurred, and we are vulnerable to the powers of them
all. But why?
If we listen to the media, which is, of course, the orchestrated and
desired state of affairs, we are told of impending economic disaster,
impending terrorist threats to the homeland, impending pandemics,
impending eco-weather super storms, and impending mass power grid
and all in step with the Martial Law system that has
been fully set into place and stone via many, many Executive Orders.
Looks like all that's needed to release that beast is another
good catastrophe and, according to our media, a good many are in the
The other angle of this story, however, is not mentioned on corporate
TV that being the one-world governance slant. They don't talk about
one-world government on television. They don't talk about Agenda 21
or its partnering/stakeholding bureaucracies or the Biosphere
Reserves and their direct-connect to the United Nations, World Bank,
and World Trade Organization. They don't talk about the taking down
of the Christian religion and the dumbing down of American children.
They don't talk about the Socialist take-over of the American public
school system. They don't talk about manufactured super viruses, the
intent to draft female children, or mandatory military service into
Corporate media does not report on the nearly complete
judicial/political movement to disassemble the United States
Constitution. Nor do they report on George Washington University's
intent to replace our Constitution with a Communitarian-based
constitution a hybrid Communist-Socialist government and its
mandatory compliance. Corporate media does not report the facts and
specific details of the Patriot Act II.
No, corporate media does not report on one-world governance because,
if they did, they would have to tell the American populace that the
American government is no longer in the hands of the American people.
They would have to tell them, that for decades and decades, their
votes were manipulated and that all candidates in the last 50 years
(or many more) were well paid and connected globalist planners and/or
Equally, media would have to tell the American people that they were
to be forced into Socialist governance using military-style force.
They would have to tell the people to turn over their private
property, their guns, their gods, their children, their sick and
infirmed, their rights to mobility, and their rights to all
dissension. They would have to tell the people that their
Constitution was trumped and buried by the very people they elected
with waving flag in hand.
The corporate media would have to report on the North American Sector
and the Organization of American States (www.oas.org)- the new
collective global/political region of Canada-America-Mexico-Central
America-South America all of which mandated by the United Nations.
And they would also have to tell the American people about the
stakeholding/regionalization connection the replacement governing
system for counties and local jurisdictions, which specifically
replaces local governance and voting with appointed bureaucrats. And
they would have to tell the people about the herding of the masses
into eco-villages, communitarian housing, corporate live-work units,
or collectives, so to speak. You know, the ones with the built-in
policing services (C.O.P.S. = Community Oriented Policing Services
look it up).
They would have to report on the cross-training of national
militaries, in preparation for one-law-fits-all governance (Cross-
training is interesting as one might assume that American boys and
girls might be hesitant to fire upon their friends, families, and
fellow citizens. However, soldiers from other countries especially
American-despising nations would, no doubt, easily solve that
Corporate media doesn't like to report on the patenting of
genetically modified food or animals, either almost as much as they
dislike reporting on mandatory and tainted vaccines as in be
vaccinated or be arrested or vaccinate your children or lose your
children. And speaking of children, media skips the part about the
complete elimination of American history and Constitution studies,
because they would have to explain to the people that American
history and Constitution are eliminated, and that the new global
citizens, your children, are now being trained for his and her work
Corporate media does not mention "humane" global population
reduction the scientific mastering of euthanasia and super viruses
manufactured by scientists who, globally, wind up mysteriously dying
or disappearing. And media has never touched the subject of Agenda 21
and its ties to the largest "environmental" non-profits and agencies
in the world, who own more global land than entire governments, and
who have all called for massive global population reduction.
So, here's my point why, you ask, are Martial Law drills being
practiced in all states? Why does America, the land of the free, have
staffed and readied detention camps in most, if not all, states? And
why does the media not report on the most historic and compelling
news in American history? I'll tell you why. Because we are being
conquered by corporate/financial manipulation clearly and planned
catastrophes are the mode and means to the end.
"Catastrophe," and perhaps "global catastrophe," will continue to
switch on a complete Martial Law take-over and control of the
American masses. "Catastrophe," we will be told, necessitates
military take-over for our own good. I suggest to you that Martial
Law will ensue for several years to several decades until Americans
get used to the fact that they are under the jurisdiction and control
of a one-world governing body, which is absolutely an oligarchy. And
I'm equally sure that as we degrade in life style, education, and our
individual liberties are completely eliminated, our children will be
raised in a world none the wiser of past freedoms. The beacon of
freedom and freedom for the masses are to be forgotten and eliminated
from the history books much akin to the elite canon-pickers of days
The Baby Boomers are a large part of the current American population,
and we are rapidly aging. The timing of the global governance take-
over and the Martial Law system, in my opinion, is impeccable. The
globalists have done their homework and their system is masterful.
Too bad that we've been kickin' back, drinkin' beer, getting' high,
watchin' the tube, loadin' up our credit cards, and buyin' $200,000
cracker boxes while the big boys were laughing all the way to their
banking positions, political positions, and million dollar overseas
homes and mansions inside of conservation corridors the lands where
the masses dare not tread.
Kissinger once referred to the bulk of humanity as "useless eaters."
Perhaps he was being generous. Just don't be surprised when units of
men and women, with new generation weapons, are walking down Maple
Street in Americana, USA, and demanding your papers, cash, food
stores, and houses. Just keep watching TV. It will tell you what to
do when the catastrophe(s) strikes. See you in camp.
Websites for Wisdom:
found at http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?
Freedom - The Cold, Hard Facts
By Nancy Levant
January 24, 2006
There are a thousand critically important issues to deal with in
today's world, but American citizens need to be very careful. The
creation of social chaos is the fundamental tool used by
Constitutional destroyers to divide and conquer the ability to focus
on the big prize, which is freedom. Our focus should not be upon
partisan details, but upon Constitutional dismantling. Our political
opinions and leanings will be non-issues if there is no
As each day passes, and we continue to see our "representatives"
refusing to represent American freedom, and as we continue to see our
voting powers eliminated by the non-elected partnership-stakeholding
system of global leadership, one wonders if there will ever be
another election. Specifically, one wonders if Martial Law will be
implemented before another election date rolls around. Due to the
fact that our nation has been totally and very skillfully bankrupted
by highly educated economic experts, one wonders if we have been set
up to purposefully crash, whereby giving Martial Law its jurisdiction.
It should be very clear to every American citizen that 1) something
is terribly wrong with our "representative government," and 2) our
representatives and their corporate partners are recreating public
law. Our rights as American citizens are being systematically,
purposefully eliminated. Therefore, our opinions about this social
condition and that cultural trend are pointless. In the very near
future, changes could occur in America that will make all
partisanship null and void. Martial Law knows no partisanship and
cares not for opinion. It knows only military-style dictatorship.
At this point in time, I strongly suggest that American people
prepare for the worst. All indicators lead to renegade politicians
who are overthrowing the American government and its Constitution. No
one can deny this fact. Equally, a Martial Law system is totally,
completely in place thanks to three or more decades of powers amassed
through presidential Executive Orders and many, many Acts.
Consider the following:
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990 allows the government to take over all modes of
transportation and control of highways and seaports.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government to seize and control the
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997 allows the government to take over all
electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998 allows the government to take over all food
resources and farms.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians
into work brigades under government supervision.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001 allows the government to take over all health,
education and welfare functions.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002 designates the Postmaster General to operate a
national registration of all persons.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003 allows the government to take over all airports
and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to
relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate
areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 allows the government to take over railroads,
inland waterways and public storage facilities.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of
Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive
Orders in to effect in times of increased international tensions and
economic or financial crisis.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice
to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute
industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to
control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions,
and to advise and assist the President.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049 assigns emergency preparedness function to
federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative
Executive Orders issued over a fifteen-year period.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness
Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of
production and distribution of energy sources, wages, salaries,
credit, and the flow of money in U.S. financial institutions in any
undefined national emergency. It also provides that when the
President declares a state of emergency, Congress cannot review the
action for six months.
Add to these Executive Orders the Model State Emergency Health Powers
Act, which would give state governors and public health officials the
· Force individuals suspected of harboring an "infectious disease"
to undergo medical examinations.
· Track and share an individual's personal health information,
including genetic information.
· Force persons to be vaccinated, treated, or quarantined for
· Mandate that all health care providers report all cases of
persons who harbor any illness or health condition that may be caused
by an epidemic or an infectious agent and might pose a "substantial
risk" to a "significant number of people or cause a long-term
disability." (Note: Neither "substantial risk" nor "significant
number" are defined in the draft.)
· Force pharmacists to report any unusual or any increased
prescription rates that may be caused by epidemic diseases.
· Preempt existing state laws, rules and regulations, including
those relating to privacy, medical licensure, and--this is key--
· Control public and private property during a public health
emergency, including pharmaceutical manufacturing plants, nursing
homes, other health care facilities, and communications devices.
· Mobilize all or any part of the "organized militia into service
to the state to help enforce the state's orders."
· Ration firearms, explosives, food, fuel and alcoholic beverages,
among other commodities.
· Impose fines and penalties to enforce their orders.
Then, consider the following:
· Super viruses are manufactured.
· Borders are open to illegals of all shapes and kinds.
· NAFTA-CAFTA-FTAA enforces internationalized economics.
· Imported nuclear devices are known to be in the United States.
· Our nation was bureaucratically bankrupted by the Federal
· The Partnership-stakeholding bureaucracy eliminates voting.
· The elected representatives of the American people are rapidly
eliminating constitutional rights.
· The American military is completely dedicated to foreign
theaters, while a secondary military system has been established on
the homeland with new and unimaginable powers over the citizenry.
Let us consider the powers of the Patriot Act II:
SECTION 501 (Expatriation of Terrorists) expands the definition
of "enemy combatant" to all American citizens who "may" have violated
any provision of Section 802 of the first Patriot Act. (Section 802
is the new definition of domestic terrorism, and the definition
is "any action that endangers human life that is a violation of any
Federal or State law.") Section 501 of the second Patriot Act
directly connects to Section 125 of the same act. The Justice
Department boldly claims that the incredibly broad Section 802 of the
First USA Patriot Act isn't broad enough and that a new, unlimited
definition of terrorism is needed.
Under Section 501 a US citizen engaging in lawful activities can be
grabbed off the street and thrown into a van never to be seen again.
The Justice Department states that they can do this because the
person "had inferred from conduct" that they were not US citizens.
Remember Section 802 of the First USA Patriot Act states that any
violation of Federal or State law can result in the "enemy combatant"
SECTION 201 of the second Patriot Act makes it a criminal act for any
member of the government or any citizen to release any information
concerning the incarceration or whereabouts of detainees. It also
states that law enforcement does not have to tell the press who they
have arrested, and they never have to release the names.
SECTION 301 and 306 (Terrorist Identification Database) set up a
national database of "suspected terrorists" and radically expand the
database to include anyone associated with suspected terrorist groups
and anyone involved in crimes or having supported any group
designated as "terrorist." These sections also set up a national DNA
database for anyone on probation or who has been on probation for any
crime, and orders State governments to collect the DNA for the
SECTION 312 gives immunity to law enforcement engaging in spying
operations against the American people and would place substantial
restrictions on court injunctions against Federal violations of civil
rights across the board.
SECTION 101 will designate individual terrorists as foreign powers
and again strip them of all rights under the "enemy combatant"
SECTION 102 states clearly that any information gathering, regardless
of whether or not those activities are illegal, can be considered to
be clandestine intelligence activities for a foreign power. This
makes newsgathering illegal.
SECTION 103 allows the Federal government to use wartime martial law
powers domestically and internationally without Congress declaring
that a state of war exists.
SECTION 106 is bone chilling in its straightforwardness. It states
that broad general warrants by the secret FSIA court (a panel of
secret judges set up in a star chamber system that convenes in an
undisclosed location) granted under the first Patriot Act are not
good enough. It states that government agents must be given immunity
for carrying out searches with no prior court approval. This section
throws out the entire Fourth Amendment against unreasonable searches
SECTION 109 allows secret star-chamber courts to issue contempt
charges against any individual or corporation who refuses to
incriminate themselves or others. This section annihilates the last
vestiges of the Fifth Amendment.
SECTION 110 restates that key police state clauses in the first
Patriot Act were not sunsetted and removes the five-year sunset
clause from other subsections of the first Patriot Act. After all,
the media has told us: "This is the New America. Get used to it. This
SECTION 111 expands the definition of the "enemy combatant"
SECTION 122 restates the government's newly announced power
of "surveillance without a court order."
SECTION 123 restates that the government no longer needs warrants and
that the investigations can be a giant dragnet-style sweep described
in press reports about the Total Information Awareness Network. One
passage reads, "thus the focus of domestic surveillance may be less
precise than that directed against more conventional types of crime."
*Note: Over and over again, in subsection after subsection, the
second Patriot Act states that its new Soviet-type powers will be
used to fight international terrorism, domestic terrorism and other
types of crimes. Of course the government has already announced in
Section 802 of the first USA Patriot act that any crime is considered
SECTION 126 grants the government the right to mine the entire
spectrum of public and private sector information from bank records
to educational and medical records. This is the enacting law to allow
ECHELON and the Total Information Awareness Network to break down any
and all walls of privacy. The government states that they must look
at everything to "determine" if individuals or groups might have a
connection to terrorist groups. As you can now see, you are guilty
until proven innocent.
SECTION 127 allows the government to takeover coroners' and medical
examiners' operations whenever they see fit.
SECTION 128 allows the Federal government to place gag orders on
Federal and State Grand Juries and to take over the proceedings. It
also disallows individuals or organizations to even try to quash a
Federal subpoena. So now defending yourself will be a terrorist
SECTION 129 destroys any remaining whistle blower protection for
SECTION 202 allows corporations to keep secret their activities with
toxic biological, chemical or radiological materials.
SECTION 205 allows top Federal officials to keep all financial
dealings secret, and anyone investigating them can be considered a
SECTION 303 sets up national DNA database of suspected terrorists.
The database will also be used to "stop other unlawful activities."
It will share the information with state, local and foreign agencies
for the same purposes.
SECTION 311 federalizes your local police department in the area of
SECTION 313 provides liability protection for businesses, especially
big businesses, that spy on their customers for Homeland Security,
violating their privacy agreements. It goes on to say that these are
all preventative measures - has anyone seen Minority Report? This is
the access hub for the Total Information Awareness Network.
SECTION 321 authorizes foreign governments to spy on the American
people and to share information with foreign governments.
SECTION 322 removes Congress from the extradition process and allows
officers of the Homeland Security complex to extradite American
citizens anywhere they wish. It also allows Homeland Security to
secretly take individuals out of foreign countries.
SECTION 402 is titled "Providing Material Support to Terrorism." The
section reads that there is no requirement to show that the
individual even had the intent to aid terrorists.
SECTION 403 expands the definition of weapons of mass destruction to
include any activity that affects interstate or foreign commerce.
SECTION 404 makes it a crime for a terrorist or "other criminals" to
use encryption in the commission of a crime.
SECTION 408 creates "lifetime parole" (basically, slavery) for a
whole host of crimes.
SECTION 410 creates no statute of limitations for anyone that engages
in terrorist actions or supports terrorists. Remember: any crime is
now considered terrorism under the first Patriot Act.
SECTION 411 expands crimes that are punishable by death. Again, they
point to Section 802 of the first Patriot Act and state that any
terrorist act or support of terrorist act can result in the death
SECTION 421 increases penalties for terrorist financing. This section
states that any type of financial activity connected to terrorism
will result to time in prison and $10-50,000 fines per violation.
SECTIONS 427 sets up asset forfeiture provisions for anyone engaging
in terrorist activities. There are many other sections that I did not
cover in the interest of time. The American people were shocked by
the despotic nature of the first Patriot Act. The second Patriot Act
dwarfs all police state legislation in modern world history. (Many
thanks to Alex Jones for this important list and research).
The only remaining question for American people is whether Executive
Orders, and acts such as the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act
and the Patriot Act II are imposed "in case of crisis," or whether
they are created as part of a pre-determined decision to dismantle
Constitutional America. And either way, is this how we want to live?
Carefully consider all the above. Carefully consider the fact that
the American military has been out of the country for nearly 100
years, fighting foreign battles. And carefully consider that most of
the Executive Orders were written prior to 9-11, and that the first
Patriot Act was immediately passed following 9-11 without Congress
having access to the contents of the Act. Something is terribly
wrong, and my greatest fear is that American people will never have
another opportunity for a national vote. It would appear that other
plans are in the making.
Websites for Wisdoms:
found at http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?
Are We, the People, the Enemy?
By Nancy Levant
January 23, 2006
Well, our "elected" are certainly not listening to us, and that is
quite a dilemma. For the last several years, every time I wrote to
Congress and expressed my concerns for things like the Patriot Act,
CAFTA, the Endangered Species Act, etc., I get responses that 1)
don't address any of the points I made in my letters, and 2) I am
told in no uncertain terms why the Patriot Act, CAFTA, and other
legislation will be (and was) supported. One of my reps actually had
the nerve to say that CAFTA was needed to be fair to the Third World.
What about the world of the American family and the world that you
are paid to represent?
I've seen at least 100 letters from reps, which circulate on the
Internet, also proving that we are not being listened to and our
opinions not taken into account. I think it is clear to say that
government by the people has become a clichι, for it is certainly not
a point of fact or law anymore. Our elected are demonstrating a
regime change mentality in action and deed. Let's look at some facts:
Anti-American and anti-Constitution legislation is regularly
Mis-named legislation further hides anti-American, anti-liberty
agendas (New Freedom Initiative, for example).
Most new federal laws and Executive Orders are now a direct result of
U.N. Agenda 21.
Most new federal laws and Executive Orders are now a direct result of
centralizing power around the mandates of the World Bank, the World
Trade Organization, environmental "non-profits," and the United
Most legislation now attempts to eliminate Constitutional rights.
Many bills are now written in preparation of what is clearly a coming
Police State, which speaks volumes to the notion of pre-planned
catastrophe and crisis.
Decades of presidential Executive Orders have defined the rules,
regulations, and hierarchy of a highly defined Police State and
Martial Law system, which again speaks to pre-conceived knowledge of
impending catastrophe or crisis most written prior to 2001.
30+ years of meetings held in foreign countries to lay out the game
plan for global corporate governance.
Think tanks and global elites planning the future of the United
States without the knowledge, consent, or vote of the American people.
Pharmaceutical companies given legislated invasion powers over the
future of American children and over the authority of parenthood.
The U.N. Agenda 21, environmental "non-profits," and international
corporations dictating all American public school curriculum.
The U.N. Agenda 21, environmental organizations, and international
think tanks redefining and writing a new and global AND enforced
Global governmental collection of DNA samples and legislated DNA
Governmentally enforced open borders and illegal immigration.
Governmentally enforced partnership-stakeholding bureaucracy, whereby
eliminating voting power and elected representation.
Purposeful legislation and Executive Orders that criminalize the
right to dissent.
The clear and present danger of representatives who are not listening
to or representing the will of the American people.
The clear and present danger of the American military being forced
into 50+ years of foreign service, whereby removing our military from
the American homeland.
Legislated rights given to "corporation," while eliminating
Constitutional rights of the people.
Dismantling the United States Constitution without the opinion,
consent, knowledge, or vote of the American people.
And these are just a few of the facts the ones that are obvious.
God only knows what is hidden and on the burner. It would appear that
we are living amidst a renegade and conquering system, and so my
question is this what happens when they (not us) pass the Patriot
Act II? Will the millions who have spoken out against this renegade
system be jailed? Will our computers be confiscated? Will our ability
to drive a car and to have mobility rights be denied in 2008 when the
Real ID system is enforced?
Will we be denied jobs, paychecks, food and water? What is in store
for all those who stood up for the Constitution of the United States,
for freedom, and for their rights? Who will live in America's
What will happen to the people who refuse to allow the United States
of America to be dismantled and globalized under a one world global
government? What will happen to Quaker and Mennonite families who
refuse to participate and serve in foreign armies? What will happen
to conscientious objects that refuse to serve under the U.N.?
What will happen to American parents who refuse to allow the public-
private partnerships of government, such as the public school system,
and big pharma to force drugs into their children? Are American
citizens to be jailed for fighting for the survival of their nation,
or are we to sit quietly by while we are openly, brazenly, conquered
from within? Will a largely senior citizen movement, who worked to
expose insider devotion to a regime change, be arrested as traitors
to a global government?
We have all wondered about these issues. We have all talked about
these questions. Perhaps it is time to put these questions to our
representatives and to our President. Does disagreeing with their
legislation, which is not the will of the people, mean that we have
become terrorists, as John Ashcroft once boldly stated? Are the
people of the United States of America the enemy of our so-called
representative government? And is there any elected official in the
United States of America willing to answer these questions?
Sadly, the answer to that question is no, they will not. Do tell...
Websites for Wisdom:
found at http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?
Erecting a Police State in America - A Very Bad Plan
By Nancy Levant
January 23, 2006
As a response to 911, our elected representatives have given to the
American people, via many statutes, The Department of Homeland
Security - a civilian agency. They have also broadened the national
powers and militarized FEMA.
Equally, C.O.P.S. (Community Oriented Policing Services) has been
massively and federally funded to set up private policing patrols in
most, if not all, of the new deed-restricted and "planned"
communities where many American citizens now live. These policed
communities are being raised in every state in the nation rapidly.
City and county law enforcement are now required to cross-train with
military, and those lines have now blurred. All across our nation,
para-military forces, including foreign troops at our Southern
border, are performing practice drills over and over and over again.
A full-blown Martial Law system, which includes the "suspension" of
the Constitution of the United States, has been set into stone by
presidential Executive Orders. Most of these orders were declared
prior to 911, but for the sake of this article, we will overlook that
fact for now.
Without question, our elected representatives have rapidly erected
plans for a police state in our nation. Now, let's assume that their
decisions to raise a paramilitary police state in the United States
of America are merely a response to 911. For now, we will also
overlook the thousands upon thousands of treaties, charters,
compacts, and "partnership" bureaucracies that were signed and
implemented behind our backs the ones with direct links to the
United Nations, the World Bank, the World Trade Organization, and the
Organization of American States, for example. However, we will put
all of this aside for now.
But let's get to the issue of homeland security, as in securing our
form of government and the freedoms guaranteed to the people of the
50 United States. Post 911, our elected representatives raised a new
homeland security system, which includes full-blown and documented
plans for 1) the suspension of our Constitution, 2) military rule of
the nation, and 3) a national populace stripped of their civil
rights all of them.
With this in mind, I suggest to you the following:
Our elected have no authority whatsoever, explicit or implicit, to
plan for the suspension of our Constitutional form of government, as
they are sworn by oath, and by the income we pay them, to its
upholding and defense.
Martial Law in the United States of America will result in
unthinkable and unintended consequences.
That organizing a paramilitary system, with powers to suspend
Constitutional authority and government is, at best, detrimental to
the nation, its people, and a very shortsighted and dangerous plan.
Should a police state ensue, it will result in permanent and sweeping
societal and governmental changes. All nations that lost their
governmental structures, and citizens who lost all civil rights due
to military take-over, never woke up one sunny, magical morning and
found their governments and rights restored. If in doubt, I refer you
to South and Central America for the results of paramilitary take-
No American citizen, including some in office, wants Martial Law, a
police state, and military dictatorship EVEN IF there IS another 911,
or worse. In fact, that would be the worst thing that could possibly
happen. Stay with me and I will tell you why.
Our elected representatives have not exercised clear, Constitutional
authority by planning for, much less erecting, a full-blown police
state, and with the full intention of suspending our nation's
Is there a homeland security problem? Yes, indeed, there is. Have our
representatives devised an emergency response system that has
enormous potential for unthinkable consequences? Yes, they certainly
have. On this point, I am in total agreement with the ACLU.
So, the question begs why would our elected representatives make
unconstitutional decisions to raise a new national security system
that is fraught with danger BEFORE using their Constitutional
authority, which not only permits them to LEGALLY defend against
violations of law, insurrections, and/or invasions, but is clearly
defined within the Constitution, as well? When our Constitution
contains an amendment, as well as Article I, Section 8, Clauses 15
and 16, which were written SPECIFICALLY to address homeland security
due to violations of law, insurrections, and/or invasions, and
specific instructions on how to defend and protect all of the states
in the nation, why did our representatives completely ignore this
amendment and instead step wholly out of their legal authority to
devise a police/military dictatorship? Excuse me, but planning to
destroy our Constitution and our national independence is a criminal
act. No one inside of government or otherwise has the legal authority
to devise such a plan.
When our elected representatives are employing inappropriate and
dangerous means, of any kind, that could result in a police state,
which they devised, they are acting outside of any legal authority
AND they are not following their LEGAL book of instructions for
securing the homeland. Usurping the governmental structure of this
nation by erecting a police state is not only fundamentally
destructive; it is also a criminal act in this nation. Law is law.
So, to our representatives, I say this: Instead of illegally
shredding the Constitution, how about using the document you swore to
uphold to secure this nation if that is, indeed, your intent.
Planning and erecting a dictatorship in the United States, using
synthetic and "what if" scenarios and hysteria to do so, is beyond
stupid. Equally, you are affirmatively destroying the structure that
employs you. Your shortsightedness is, frankly, astounding! Equally
astounding is your refusal to look to the Constitution for answers,
assuming you are looking for answers.
Now, to my readers, as WE are law-abiding people, we, too, must look
to our Constitution for homeland security. But first, let's look at
some historical parallels to our current condition, which serve to
clarify our current and terribly vulnerable condition, thanks to our
elected and their gun controlling means and methods.
Consider the French and Indian Wars. During those times,
many "enemies" of the settlers were unknown entities and potentially
anywhere and everywhere. Colonists had to deal with the international
war between the French and English, which drew them into a rather
irregular war, and they also had to deal with Tory and Indian bands,
which were more akin to today's terrorism-style conflicts. Those wars
were a mix of undeclared conflicts and a declared war, but more akin
to "terrorism" threats. People had to be prepared for just about
anything, at any time, and attack by multiple means and numbers. Then
consider the Revolutionary War, which immediately followed, a
declared and international war. The founding fathers of the United
States were very familiar with both the French and Indian conflicts
AND declared and international warfare. These men had experienced and
seen it all. And this is specifically why they worded the 2nd
Amendment to the Constitution as follows:
"A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free
State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be
Now, the founding fathers of this nation, having had experience with
undeclared and declared conflicts and wars, specifically placed
homeland security powers and authority into the hands of the each of
the states' militias, which were not only necessary to the security
of each state, but were also MANDATORY. Via the Colonial and State
Militia Acts of that time, every male between the ages of 16 and 60
were REQUIRED to be in service to the defense of their states and, if
necessary, their nation.
The right of the people to keep and bear arms was absolutely
understood by the founding fathers as necessary to the "security"
of "free" states. Therefore, a "free state" is one in which the
population of that state is always armed IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN that
state's security. This is not rocket science. Reinstate the
Constitutional definition of "militias," which were organizations
specifically created to protect the homeland using a fully armed
population, and you have homeland security. But how, you ask?
As with most historical perversions, the word "militia" now denotes
something entirely different to the minds of American people. We now
believe militias to be radical, fringe-type groups. However, from a
Constitutional point of fact and law, the "Militia of several States"
meant every male person, age 16 to 60, was required by law to 1) have
adversary-worthy weapons in his home, maintained in proper working
order and subject to inspection, and 2) a proper store of ammunition,
and other accoutrements that were necessary to defend his city, state
Let me make this as plain as I can The 2nd Amendment to the
Constitution of the United States of America states that a well-
regulated Militia is NECESSARY to the SECURITY of a free state, and
therefore the defined Militia is to be 1) a fully armed population,
2) with arms and ammunitions in ALL homes, and 3) is NOT an option
but a LEGAL DUTY of ALL male citizens. The right to keep and bear
arms is, therefore, 1) an absolute, and 2) applies to all free male
citizens, according to our 2nd Amendment (there are/were exceptions
most do not apply today being related to the legal ownership of
According to our purposefully ignored 2nd Amendment, which has also
been politically perverted into a keep and bear-only mentality, the
actual meaning of the 2nd Amendment IS homeland security. Consider
the following: Imagine if America, today, had an entirely armed
population, as did our Colonial ancestors in every state. Every man
on every street is armed with standard, military issue weapons. Now,
let us then consider how we would feel about our natural right of
resistance and self-preservation to restrain the violence of ANY type
of oppression, insurrection, or invasion.
The 2nd Amendment not only provides our elected representatives with
a homeland security book of instructions, it also explains,
explicitly, that in order to have freedom AND security
simultaneously, a well-regulated Militia is "NECESSARY." For any
insurrections, you call up the Militia, which is every man, in any
state, or in any neighborhood, on-call, every day of every year, and
And again I say to the careerists in office, the Constitution solves
the problem of securing the homeland. Not one of you can question the
fact that a Militia is necessary to the security of a free state. The
need for the reinstatement of the Militia of the several states is
not an obscure fantasy. It is a conclusion of fact and law that the
Constitution has adopted, and therefore applies to every public
official. No public official can deny this conclusion, because every
public official has taken an "oath or affirmation to support this
In conclusion, I ask all gun-owning readers to please forward this
article to your gun clubs and associations. I would like to see the
NRA, the GOA, the NFA, the AFA, and all other gun associations take
the lead and initiative to revisit what actually may have been the
founding intent of their organizations. We need to lobby all state
legislatures to introduce bills to reinstate the states' militias
according to the 2nd Amendment and the current state of American
affairs. We the People have the legal right to raise the
Constitutional Militia in each and every one of our states, and the
proper way to do so is legislatively. The language of the
Constitution will not be undermined. Nor is it up for
reinterpretation by anyone. Legality is on our side.
We also know that ANY gun control, whatsoever, goes directly contrary
to our 2nd Amendment rights SPECIFICALLY due to the fact that
homeland security IS a dire fact of today's world, and SPECIFICALLY
due to the raising of a police state, which WILL disarm the public in
order to succeed. You've heard the term "Gun-Free Zones?" How about
Defense-Free Zones, or for that matter, how about a totally disarmed
nation other than those in the police state? Have you ever heard the
legal term "badge of slavery?" Disarmament is the first badge of
Also, what is the point of winning the battle against "terrorism"
overseas if we lose the battle at home? Considering the absence of
American troops from American soil for the last 100 years, what other
option to homeland security is viable? Equally, and as history relays
in one police state after another, usurpers and tyrants initiate
criminal activities via secret-police-style apparatuses, spying,
intelligence and investigatory agencies. Resistance networks tend to
get "broken up" prior to armed force and public displays of the
actual police state itself.
I would rather see America LEGALLY defended by her citizens than by a
foreign/domestic-hybrid paramilitary force created by careerists and
bureaucrats, who have unconstitutionally and illegally erected police
state infrastructures all across the United States of America and
to what purpose and end only the globalists know, for now.
It's time to take back our government and our Constitutional right
and DUTY to defend our Constitution and constitutionally guaranteed
freedoms. We have every legal right to do so, and our 2nd Amendment
mandates that Militias of the several States (meaning every one of
our states) be raised to secure this nation. Assuming the boys on the
Hill will not be so inclined, we must demand that all of our states
comply with the mandates of the 2nd Amendment. They cannot legally
refuse to do so as they are subordinate to the Constitution and its
For help in reinstating the Constitutional Militia via your state
legislatures, contact Dr. Edwin Vieira via NewsWithViews.com. The
answer to our vulnerability and our security is very simple and very
absolute. Tyrants, usurpers with armies, and foreign terrorists are
no match for a nationally armed population. The answer is so simple
and clear. America must remain free and sovereign America. Therefore,
you arm the full citizenry to secure freedom, as instructed by the
2nd Amendment. This IS homeland security.
We live in an environment inundated by ignorance and disinformation.
Therefore, it is understandable why we have lacked for so long any
social solidarity or sense of mutual reliance upon each other as
American people. We have been purposefully, covertly, divided into
paranoid separatist groups via the liberal/conservative, young/old,
religion and pigmentation divide mechanisms. I suggest that being a
part of your state's militia will help you to remember that you are
an American, with rights and freedom first and foremost, and that
your neighbors all of them have and are the same.
We need to be united once more as a nationality that is based upon
free people and THEIR government. We have to be united, because 1) a
police state cannot possibly exist under the Constitution, but is
being planned nonetheless, and 2) by defining "homeland security" as
a centralized bureaucratic apparatus that interlinks intelligence
agencies, police departments and programs, community special forces,
FEMA, technological surveillance and databases, and the Armed Forces,
Congress has evaded its DUTY "to call forth the Militia, as mandated
by Article I, Section 8, Clauses 15 and 16 of the Constitution, to
execute the LAWS of the Union, to suppress Insurrections and repel
Invasions." Instead they have invented and erected an anti-
constitutional infrastructure for Martial Law, military take-over,
and a police state. This was a remarkably stupid thing to do.
For all of you who have asked ten thousand times what you can do
this is it. I suggest you begin with your gun associations and Dr.
Edwin Vieira via NewsWithViews.com. We have to get bills introduced
into the state legislatures to reinstate the Militias of the several
In understanding your Constitutional rights and obligations, the true
power (and duty) to understand the Constitutional Militia lies in
Article I, Section 8, Clauses 15 and 16. The 2nd Amendment emphasizes
the importance of these clauses because its statement that "a well
regulated Militia [is] necessary to the security of a free State"
ties down the interrelationship so well, and binds all public
officials to accept, follow, and implement it no questions asked.
But, as a matter of law, the Militia do not depend on the 2nd
Amendment. Even if there were no 2nd Amendment, the powers/duties of
the Militia would be the same. We're getting smarter every day! Now
let's get the job done! We need the help and power of our gun
associations, and we need them now. Start emailing, calling, and
forwarding. Also refer them to Dr. Edwin Vieira for guidance.
found at http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?
The Goon Show of Bush and Bin Laden
By CHRIS FLOYD
Let's see now: President dropping in the polls; impeachment talk over
illegal wiretaps gaining traction; majority of Americans now
supporting withdrawal from Iraq; Abramoff scandal reaching into the
White House; big push starting for war with Iran; the Bush gang
reduced to defending their crime, deception and despotism with their
last, threadbare card, the "terrorist threat".....
Why, yes, I think it's about time for a guest shot from Osama!
And so the deadly symbiosis between that dynamic, death-peddling duo,
Bush and bin Laden, goes on. And as usual, the timing -- even the
wording -- of the terrorist's bloviation falls, with eerie
perfection, into lock-step with Bush's political needs. As noted
above, the only way Bush can justify his now-open establishment of a
de facto dictatorship -- arbitrary rule by "the unitary executive" --
is by the constant, hysterical invocation of a terrorist threat. To
meet this threat, to preserve "our way of life," says Bush, we must
shred all of our inherent liberties, our inalienable rights, our
constitutional freedoms, our centuries-old system of checks and
balances; we must give all power to the Leader, who will protect the
only thing that matters: our skin. This is of course a cynical and
absurd argument; no terrorist attack, no matter how massive, could
destroy the American republic. This can only be done from the inside -
- and only by the deliberate choice of those in power. At every turn,
the Bush gang has sought to instil a blind, quaking, automatic fear
in the American people, so that when they hear the word "terror,"
they jump to the Boss's tune, they run for cover and burn the
Constitution to keep them warm in their hidey-hole. It's been a
remarkable exercise, really: the attempt to create a polity of
And if there is another terrorist attack in the United States -- as
there certainly will be, given the fact that the Bushists
deliberately allowed bin Laden to escape capture at Tora Bora in 2001
(more on this topic here next week), and have swelled the terrorist
ranks with their murderous war in Iraq -- the last vestiges, the last
pretenses of American civil rights and individual liberty will be
stripped away. The people have long been inculcated with this idea,
from top Bushists such as General Tommy Franks: if there is another
terrorist attack in the "Homeland," then "the Constitution might be
suspended." This is now the "conventional wisdom," a widely accepted
notion -- despite there being no reason for such an action
whatsoever. Yet the militarist-corporatist faction now represented by
the Bushists -- which has long dreamed of suspending the civic order
and ruling by decree and martial law, and has in fact been planning
for this eventuality for decades -- will doubtless seize the day when
the next attack comes. As Bush himself said just days after the
September 11 attacks, when the bodies of the dead were still
compacted with the smoking ruins of the Twin Towers: "Through my
tears, I see opportunity."
So here we are. The dictatorship is now in the open, as the Justice
Department's tortured "defense" of Bush's high crime of arbitrary
spying this week proves once again. Like the "signing statement" that
eviscerated the much ballyhooed "anti-torture bill," the latest load
of cringing mendacity from that most servile minister, Attorney
General Al Gonzales, again confirms the Bushist principle that the
president is simply above the law: there is nothing he cannot do, no
crime he cannot order in the exercise of his "plenary powers." But
despite this naked display of apish chest-thumping -- "Me top monkey!
You do me homage! You pick my fleas, bring me best fruit!" -- there
are disturbed rumblings amongst the rabble. Recent polls show a
majority of Americans support impeachment if it is proved that Bush
ordered wiretaps without a court order. (The proof is copious, of
course; and indeed, the criminal act is openly admitted by Bush.) A
majority of Americans believe the Iraq war is a mistake and want the
troops withdrawn. The new Medicare fiasco -- which has seen
multitudes of the sick and old suffering needlessly -- will further
embitter large swathes of the people against their cruel and
What then can save the Leader? What can preserve, enhance and extend
the power of his faction to carry on God's work (which naturally
overrides any puny restrictions of human law)? What can keep the
machine grinding forward, and keep the money rolling in? Only fear.
Only cowardice. Only terror -- terror from without to justify the
terror from within.
So terror is what we are going to get. I've written of this symbiosis
many times, and a conclusion once drawn years ago is even more true
today: Dazed by the lure of loot and glory, hamstrung by their own
wilful ignorance of the complexities of history and human nature, the
third-rate thugs of the Bush Regime have entered into a collaboration
with the equally dazed, equally ignorant bin Laden mafia. Each gang
draws meaning and justification from the other, each cloaks its own
criminality and murder in the guise of a crusade against the other's
evil. And both draw their power and profit from the same unrenewable
The blood of innocent people.
Chris Floyd is a columnist for The Moscow Times and the St. Peterburg
Times, and a regular contributor to CounterPunch. His blog of
political news and commentary, Empire Burlesque, can be found at
found at http://www.counterpunch.org/floyd01232006.html