Plant Trees SF Events 2006 Archive: 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Event

 
PEPIS#80 Blair lies again in Commons about Bilderberg attendance

Busy times,

Nick Kollerstrom and I discovered yesterday that Verint, the Israeli
security firm responsible for security and surveillance technology on
the London Underground both now and during the 7/7 attacks, is being
investigated for insider dealing. In a seperate matter one of their ex
Chief Executives was on the run and tracked down and has just been
arrested in Africa. Nice to know the London Underground is in such safe
hands.

Unfortunately http://www.bilderberg.org is down this weekend. Could that be
because I just posted testimony that Blair most definately WAS at
Turnberry at the 1998 Bilderberg meeting contrary to his testimony in
the Commons last week? I spoke to the member of staff at the Hotel who
served him his breakfast and shall be contacting Norman Baker MP
tomorrow to give him the simple honest facts that Mr Blair seems unable
to. Just as he lied before to a similar question from Christopher Gill
MP in 1998 
http://www.bilderberg-mirror.org.uk/bilder.htm#Blair

Or was it this outstanding article I posted on my new forum

http://www.bilderberg.org/phpbb2  from the UK Daily Mail (which now seems to
have moved to the left of the Guardian on the Muslim veils issue) about
the web closing around the Diana conspirators, proving that there was
much going on in Paris that we have never previously been told? Feast
your eyes and intellect on this brilliant piece of investigative
journalism from Sue Reid at the Mail which is included with the Blair
Bilderberg lies story below.

Tony


Blair Quizzed on Bilderberg
Denies attending any elite conferences in the House of Commons. Is he
lying again?

Steve Watson / Infowars.net | October 20 2006
http://www.infowars.net/articles/October2006/201006Bilderberg.htm

Tony Blair was questioned in the House of Commons yesterday on his
involvement with the secretive Bilderberg Group. Liberal Democrat MP,
Norman Baker asked Blair to provide a full answer to a previous 12th
October question about Bilderberg and whether Mr Blair had had any
involvement in Bilderberg Conferences since he became Prime Minister in
1997.

The entry into the House of Commons records is below and can be viewed
online here:

Prime Minister
Bilderberg Group
Norman Baker: To ask the Prime Minister pursuant to the answer of 12
October 2006, Official Report, column 862W, on the Bilderberg Group, if
he will provide the information requested in respect of himself since
1997. [95308]

The Prime Minister: I have not attended any such meetings.

Is Blair telling the truth? Certainly he has lied about previous
attendances to Bilderberg meetings, most notably the 1993 conference
which he attended before he'd even become leader of his own party. One
year after his attendance Blair became leader of the Labour party and a
rapid rise to power, culminating in his election as Prime Minister in
1997, ensued that baffled many political analysts.

In 1998 an MP asked Blair the same question to which he gave the same
answer, that he had never attended a Bilderberg meeting. However, the
evidence clearly shows he was there. A number of mainstream media
reports, plus the official Bilderberg attendee list, confirm that Blair
attended Bilderberg in Athens in 1993. Furthermore, Parliamentary
records prove he was there with long term member, and supposed
opposition party stalwart Ken Clarke.

Tony Gosling at Bilderberg.org has tirelessly worked to expose the
influence that the Bilderberg group has on world events. Here he
analyses the incredible rise to power that other Western leaders have
experienced after attending Bilderberg meetings.

Norman Baker, the MP who questioned Blair, has recently made waves in
British politics by launching into a private, year-long investigation
into the death of Dr David Kelly, the scientist who found himself under
siege after apparently accusing the government of 'sexing up' the
case for war to a BBC journalist.

Kelly, the UK's leading weapons inspector, was found dead under a tree
on Harrowdown Hill in Oxfordshire after telling associates and friends
that he feared that's what would happen to him. An inquiry set up under
Lord Hutton duly reported that Dr Kelly had committed suicide. In a
brave attempt to reveal the truth, Norman Baker disputes this
conclusion.

Baker has also recently suggested that he sees inconsistencies in the
official story of the 9/11 attacks.

This year's Bilderberg Conference was held in Ottawa Canada and was
covered in depth by Alex Jones and the Infowars team who went through
hell and high water to protest and raise awareness of the event.

Bilderberg has a proven history of acting in a kingmaker capacity, yet
they are unelected and unaccountable to anyone. Their directives are
driven towards undermining national sovereignty and establishing a
world order that benefits their elite interests. Both Bill Clinton and
Tony Blair were "groomed" by Bilderberg before becoming President and
Prime Minister and the mainstream media reported that Bilderberg
selected John Edwards as John Kerry's running mate in 2004.

Further Parliamentary records indicate that the shadow Chancellor of
the Exchequer attended the Bilderberg conference this year. This is
interesting given that Gordon Brown, a man on the verge of becoming the
next Prime Minister, attended the Bilderberg Conference when he was
shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer in 1991.

A House of Lords minute entry dated 11th October also indicates that an
answer is awaited on whether any ministers attended this year's
Bilderberg Conference:

The Lord Stoddart of Swindon-To ask Her Majesty's Government whether
any Ministers attended the Bilderberg Conference in Ottawa between 8th
and 11th June; if so, whether they attended in a Ministerial or private
capacity; whether they made contributions to debates; and, if so, on
which subjects. [CO] (HL7569)

It seems that some members of The Houses want to know exactly who is
attending Bilderberg meetings and in what capacity.






Revealed: Diana inquiry's tantalising new questions
By SUE REID, Daily Mail Last updated at 10:57am on 17th June 2006

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=391065&in_page_id=1770
Princess Diana

New witnesses have come forward with evidence surrounding the death of
Princess Diana

Astonishing claims by new witnesses are being examined by British
detectives investigating Diana's death. They seem incredible. But if
true, they could rock the Royal Family to its foundations.

On the night that Diana, Princess of Wales died, the lights of the
British Embassy - less than a mile from the accident spot in Paris
- blazed until dawn finally broke over the French capital.

Inside the imposing building, diplomats summoned from their sleep by
the British ambassador, Sir Michael Jay, struggled to monitor the
tragedy that was unfolding.

Millions of words have been written about the moment that Diana, with
her Muslim boyfriend Dodi Fayed, smashed into pillar 13 of the Pont
d'Alma road tunnel as they were being driven from the Ritz Hotel in a
black Mercedes at 12.20am on Sunday, August 31, 1997.

Ever since, the precise chronology of the fateful night and the roles
played by the Royal Family and the Government have been accepted almost
without serious challenge.

Yet the Mail can reveal today that new eye-witnesses have emerged in
the past few weeks with explosive testimony which raises profound
questions about the influence of the House of Windsor and the
Establishment over events surrounding the Princess's death.

These fresh accounts include the astonishing claim that the Queen's
most senior and trusted courtier was seen in Paris, at the British
Embassy, half an hour before the crash.

Furthermore, they include a baffling allegation that the RAF crew which
flew Tony Blair from his Sedgefield constituency to London to greet the
Princess's repatriated body had been on continual standby to make the
flight from two days earlier - when Diana was still alive.

During this investigation, the Mail has also received confirmation that
two diplomats working for the secret intelligence service MI6 were
operating at the British Embassy in Paris during the weeks before
Diana's death.

These two senior men - who have both enjoyed glittering careers -
have admitted their intelligence roles to Lord Stevens, the ex-head of
Scotland Yard who is heading the official inquiry into whether there
was any conspiracy to murder the Princess.

In the Paris crash, Dodi was killed outright and the Princess was at
first thought to have survived. Yet despite attempts by surgeons, she
was declared beyond medical help at the Pitie Salpetriere hospital at
4am.

By then, dozens of phone calls had flashed between the British Embassy
and Balmoral Castle, the royal retreat in Scotland where the Queen and
Diana's ex-husband, Prince Charles, were holidaying with Princes
William and Harry, then aged 15 and 12.

The Queen was the first to be told of the accident, at 2am, when she
was woken by her personal page. Still in her dressing gown, she and
Prince Philip anxiously paced the tartan-carpeted corridors throughout
the night.

Alerted immediately, Prince Charles retired to his private sitting room
next to the Queen's dressing room. There, he made calls and answered
those from Paris coming into the castle's switchboard and his mobile
phone.

On the ground floor of the castle, the Queen's deputy private secretary
Sir Robin Janvrin based himself in the equerries' room, where he also
fielded incoming messages.

Most pertinently, Sir Robin was on duty because his superior - the
Queen's private secretary, Sir Robert Fellowes, a plummy-voiced Old
Etonian and Princess Diana's brother-in-law - had taken a weekend's
leave.

Meanwhile, the Prime Minister, who was in his North-East constituency,
is said to have been woken by a call from Sir Michael Jay which had
been forwarded by a secure satellite phone via Downing Street.

At first, he was told the Princess had been involved in an accident and
then, later, of her death. It was then he began working on that
memorable - and apparently impromptu - speech which he delivered
several hours later, describing Diana as the 'People's Princess'.

It was a fitting title and one that the millions mourning Diana
embraced.

Yet just as the outpouring of grief continued in the days after the
crash, so, too, have those nagging doubts - and conspiracy theories
- about Diana's death, which refuse to abate.

As a result, Lord Stevens's team of ten detectives have interviewed
hundreds of people whose lives crossed Diana's own. Prince Charles
has been questioned. Sir Michael Jay, now Permanent Secretary at the
Foreign Office, has been asked to outline his role on the night of the
crash.

In a dramatic development in recent weeks, Sir Robert Fellowes - now
Lord Fellowes - has been asked about his whereabouts during that
tragic weekend.

Significantly, the detectives are also planning to speak to Maud
Morel-Coujard, the French legal official who oversaw the police
operation on the night of the crash. Indeed, she was waiting at the
hospital when Diana was brought there by ambulance just after 2am.

She is in a unique position to know exactly what happened and,
crucially, her evidence may give credence to the allegations about Lord
Fellowes, Mr Blair's flight and the two spies.

Her recollections may also explain the feverish volume of
communications between Paris, London and Scotland that night.

Mme Morel-Coujard is expected to say that some instructions on the
treatment of the dying Princess were issued by Sir Michael Jay, who was
also at the hospital. He was, in turn, receiving his orders via his
mobile from the British Embassy, Balmoral and Downing Street.

Most contentiously, Mme Morel-Coujard will reveal that a decision to
embalm Diana's body two hours before it was flown back to England was
made by 'the British authorities'. (Indeed, French law explicitly bans
the practice if a post-mortem examination is planned. This is because
the preserving chemical formaldehyde corrupts toxicology tests,
including those for pregnancy.)

Her revelations will stoke the controversy over why Diana's body
should have undergone this process prior to such a key forensic
examination, which took place on the Sunday at 8pm at a West London
mortuary.

Was it - as some continue to maintain, despite denials - because
Diana was pregnant with Dodi's baby? And did someone want such an
embarrassing fact kept secret?

Recently, the notion of Diana being pregnant was vehemently discounted
in the Mail on Sunday by Dominic Lawson, the husband of Diana's close
friend Rosa Monckton.

He wrote: "It is in a way obscene that such speculation is the subject
of a public inquiry (by Lord Stevens)."

He explained his wife had spent a week with Diana before her death and
had told Lord Stevens's team that the Princess could not possibly have
been pregnant with Dodi's baby.

He added: "Rosa felt obliged to reveal that, when they said goodbye on
August 20, 1997, Diana's period had started and therefore it was
biologically impossible for her to have been pregnant at the time of
her death."

So what evidence has Lord Stevens's investigation uncovered so far?
During his three-year inquiry - which has cost 2million - he has
let slip little about his findings. But at a book festival last month,
he admitted new witnesses had been found who may provide fresh clues.

He is now writing an interim report (it is expected to be finished by
September) for the Royal coroner, Michael Burgess, who will hold an
inquest next year once Lord Stevens has completed a final analysis that
includes the testimony provided by the new eye-witnesses.

The Mail has learned they include two men with extraordinary tales. The
first, whom we will call Mr X, was based at the British Embassy in
Paris and formerly worked for the Foreign Office in London.

His tantalising evidence emerged only recently through a third party.
If true, it will link the Royal Family to events in Paris on the
weekend of the Princess's death.

Mr X is said to be a middle-aged, English wireless operator at the
embassy.

He came on duty in the early evening of August 30, expecting his night
shift to be routine. From his office in the communications room,
encrypted phone calls and messages were sent from the embassy via UK
listening stations to Downing Street, the heads of Whitehall
departments and, if necessary, senior aides of the Royal Family.

Mr X was proud of his job and is an ardent royalist. However, something
unexpected happened that night which he found deeply troubling. He says
that just before midnight (as Diana was preparing to leave the Ritz
Hotel with Dodi) two well-spoken men burst through the door of the
communications room. Described as "public school", they brusquely
ordered Mr X to leave his post and not to return until told.

Mr X kept silent about this pertinent episode until 2000 because he had
signed the Official Secrets Act.

But then, apparently, he named one of the men to a third party.
Exploding with anger, he explained: "It was that b*****d Fellowes. He
turfed me out of my own office. He was in Paris the night Diana died."

Of course, Mr X may have been mistaken. Well-spoken Englishmen in smart
suits are apt to sound and look very similar. Furthermore, Mr X only
saw the two men for a few minutes. But his story, however incredible,
is being actively investigated by Lord Stevens and his team.

The Mail understands that in an initial conversation with the Diana
squad, Lord Fellowes has said he was enjoying a break at his Norfolk
estate with his wife - Diana's sister, Lady Jane Fellowes. He has
dismissed the claim he was in Paris that weekend or any part of the
night Diana died.

And what of the second new witness, whom we will call Mr Y? He has come
forward with a scenario which, if true, will also shed doubt on the
official version of Diana's death.

The Mail understands that he was interviewed at length by Lord
Stevens's detectives recently. Mr Y was one of the security staff on
duty at Tony Blair's Sedgefield constituency during the weekend that
Diana died.

It was one of the first weekends the Labour Prime Minister had spent
there with his family since his election. When news arrived overnight
that Diana was dead, Mr Blair's weekend, which had been largely free of
public engagements, was thrown into disarray.

After delivering his 'People's Princess' tribute, he returned to London
to receive Diana's body at Northolt airport at 5pm on the Sunday.

The Prime Minister's wife and their three children were put on a
scheduled British Midland flight from Teesside airport at tea-time for
them to return to Downing Street. Normally, the Prime Minister would
have travelled with them.

But instead, he boarded an RAF plane piloted by a crew based in
Scotland which had flown to Teesside. Waiting on the tarmac for Mr
Blair was Mr Y.

Idly chatting to the co-pilot, he was told something very strange.

The co-pilot, according to information now with the Diana squad, asked
him: "What's really going on? We've been on standby in Scotland
since 5pm on Friday waiting to make this flight to Northolt with the
Prime Minister."

Incredibly, and if Mr Y's memory of his conversation with the
co-pilot is correct, it would mean that Diana's death was not only
expected - it was actually planned.

Yet can that really be true? Or is it just another fantastic conspiracy
theory, one of the countless that still surround the Princess's death?

Could Mr Y have perhaps misinterpreted the words of the RAF co-pilot?
Or has his memory played tricks about events which happened almost a
decade ago?

Mr Y's claim is just one of the many mysteries that are now being
unravelled, checked and re-examined by the Diana squad.

Perhaps none of the unanswered questions is more puzzling than the
roles of the two MI6 officers who were based at the British Embassy in
Paris. Both were listed on the embassy's staff list as diplomats. Yet
one had mysteriously only just been posted to the French capital a few
days before the crash.

Their names first came to the attention of the Diana squad two years
ago when a continuous stream of informants - including one of
particular significance because of his position in Britain's special
forces - insisted that the pair were spies who were both implicated
in the Princess's death.

Significantly, in one instance, the Diana squad was passed a nine-line
note on a flimsy piece of paper purporting to come from an insider at
the headquarters of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. It has been
seen by the Mail and names both men.

Then it adds: "If you are brave enough, dig deeper to learn about them.
Both MI6. Both were involved at the highest level in the murder of the
Princess."

The files at the Diana squad headquarters, of course, are stacked high
with such wild allegations from shadowy informants. Many have a habit
of being unprovable or are simply the imaginings of over-fertile minds.

However, the Mail has learned that both these men, in their mid-40s,
have been interviewed by officers about their movements on the weekend
the Princess died. They were given permission to speak about their
roles for the first time by the head of MI6, John Scarlett.

The men have produced tickets and documents dating from 1997 which
prove they were not in Paris that weekend. One was in the South of
France with his wife and in-laws. The other was taking a short trip to
Greece.

Both have told Lord Stevens they only returned to the British Embassy,
overlooking the eternally fashionable Rue du Faubourg St Honore near
the Champs Elysees, after Diana's body had left French soil for
England.

That answer may not surprise Lord Stevens. But equally, it won't stop
him looking into the matter further. From the start of his inquiry, he
promised that his team would "go wherever the evidence takes us" in the
quest for the truth about Diana's death.

And, if necessary, that includes the powerful inner sanctums of the
British Establishment.
For updates and info, contact scott at planttrees dot org.