Plant Trees SF Events 2025 Archive: 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Event

 
Chris Martenson Substack

Stochastic Terrorism

-

Chris Martenson Substack

Stochastic Terrorism
Are US Agencies and/or NGOs Inciting Violence? 

https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=2003247&post_id=156520311

CHRIS MARTENSON 2025 Feb 5 

https://substack.com/@chrismartenson

Chris Martenson, PhD @chrismartenson
https://x.com/chrismartenson
https://peakprosperity.com
FB facebook.com
Podcasts.apple.com
https://chrismartenson.substack.com
https://www.instagram.com › chrismartenson 

Chris’ PowerPoint KeyNote videos 2020 precisely tracked covid infection spread physiology vector data simply elegantly
Chris should have replaced Fauci
Chris Martenson, PhD @chrismartenson
x.com/chrismartenson
peakprosperity.com
IG FB Podcasts.apple Substack


People are going to have to go to jail once we get to the bottom of the tactics and behaviors of what we’ll call ‘the left.’

They are openly calling for violence on the left-leaning echo chambers of Reddit and BlueSky. They are furious with Elon and his entire DOGE team and are saying things like this:

“Muskrat’s DOGE henchmen have been identified.”
“These people all live somewhere”
“time to hunt”
“Pink mist them all.”
“I’ll say it; this Nazi stooge needs to be shot.”


All this because Elon is taking a hard look at USAID, an entity that these people almost certainly couldn’t tell you one thing about a week prior.

If they are even real people.

Kash Patel needs to take a couple of days post-confirmation to settle in, and then send FBI agents around to each and every one of these accounts.

Some of them will be real people, and they should definitely be visited for openly promoting or promising violence against a prominent public person, Elon, and his team.

But I’m going to suggest that these aren’t all real accounts. In fact, I’m willing to promise that a good number of them are bots, which raises a set of thorny questions.

First, who is running these bots, and why? Presumably, it’s worth someone’s time and effort to whip up a violent frenzy.

Second, what should the penalty be if we discover these bots are being run by either government agencies or NGO cut-outs that receive government money?

In my mind inciting violence, especially seditious, treasonous, or even civil-war provoking violence should come with a very stiff set of penalties, up to and including life in prison for the most egregious cases.

There’s plenty of evidence that we’ve been subject to psychological operations aimed at the population and we’ve learned, somewhat painfully, that a good 30% of people seem unable to resist the programming.

So these poor people are jerked hither and yon by their emotional short ones, always thinking that they are the good guys. The true warriors. The smart ones. Those with moral authority at their backs.

Instead, they turn out to be easily misled people who first barked at people for not wearing entirely useless masks, then demanded concentration camps for people who didn’t get a vaccine, then switched seamlessly over to “Slava Ukraini!” with the requisite blue and yellow flags in their bios and hating on Putin, followed by putting a very wide assortment of pronouns in their online bios, before finally calling for death to Elon Musk for taking a peek at where all those USAID billions were flowing.


Again, some of these people are real, and you probably know, are related, or possibly even married to. But not all of them. Some of these are bots seeking to whip up trouble.

This is color-revolution territory. There’s a well-established method of destabilizing a country that involves getting the rats in the cage all angry and fighting each other.

The method is surprisingly simple. Just repeat emotionally loaded statements that convey a threat to someone’s life or livelihood and do it over and over and over again. It’s brainwashing 101.

If “Ossei” is a real person, they should get a knock on their door.


But what if “Ossei” is a bot? What if that bot was run by some murky NGO called something bland like “Center For Democracy and Online Safety.”

Further, what if funding for this cut-out org can be traced back to USAID, or some other blog-controlled US government entity?

Well, here’s the thing, US agencies should not be in the practice of trying to stoke violence within and among its people.

These tactics all have a name, and that name is…

Stochastic Terrorism

According to Wikipedia (which still has a few limited uses) here’s what stochastic terrorism is:

Stochastic terrorism is a form of political violence instigated by hostile public rhetoric directed at a group or an individual.

Unlike incitement to terrorism, stochastic terrorism is accomplished with indirect, vague or coded language, which grants the instigator plausible deniability for any associated violence.

A key element of stochastic terrorism is the use of media for propagation, where the person carrying out the violence may not have direct connection to any other users of violent rhetoric.

(Source)

It’s political violence instigated by ‘nudging’ people with words and phrases. It’s vague enough to avoid direct culpability, but effective enough to convince midwits and dimwits to actually go out and either commit or attempt to commit violence ‘for the cause.’

The preferred dissemination vehicle is social media:

A public figure or group disseminates violent, inflammatory rhetoric via mass-media, directed at people or groups of people, sometimes suggesting or legitimizing the use of violence.

This speech tends to be protected due to the use of ambiguous coded language, dog whistles, jokes, hints, and other subtext in statements that fall short of a criminal threshold for causation.

The ‘it was just a joke’ defense has been linked to early days of Nazism.

Stochastic terrorism involves the misuse of the public airwaves to create the impression that violence is desired by a great many people knowing that someone out there, statistically speaking, is going to take up the cause and go and commit violence against the target of the stochastic terrorism campaign.

Make no mistake, Elon is now that target, as is his entire team.


To the extent these are real people, why do they hate Elon and his team so much that they are now openly calling for their lynching, beheading, stabbing or shooting? How did they get there so quickly?

They seem to have fallen straight over a hateful cliff, without having gone through the usual progression of being annoyed, to resentful, to contemptuous, to violently hostile and finally murderous. They just went straight to being all murdery.

My view on this is that, again, to the extent that these are real people, they have been so successfully ‘nudged’ by weaponized tools of persuasion that their moral and logical circuits have been completely fried. Further, I do not know if this is recoverable. It might reflect permanent damage, as seems to be the case for Sam Harris and his advanced case of Trump Derangement Syndrome, or TDS.

But TDS has been operationalized and now that’s been turned into EDS and DDS (for Elon and DOGE, respectively).

Again, I sincerely doubt these newly murderous people could even tell you one specific program that USAID ran that they are allegedly worked up about. We saw this over and over again during Kamal’s run where people on the street would tell interviewers they were voting for Kamala because of her policies but when asked to give a single example, came up entirely blank.

This simply speaks to the power of the tools of persuasion that are in play. These are tools of the state and its many shadowy NGO allies.

Tools that are housed somewhere within this diagram:


Not Getting The Memo

Marco Rubio, the new Secretary of State said of USAID:

“They are completely unresponsive. They don’t even consider that they work for the US. They just think they are a global entity and that their master is the globe and not the United Stated. … Now we have rank insubordination…their basic attitude is “We don’t work for anyone, we work for ourselves and no agency of government can tell us what to do.””

(Source)

Now, does that sound like an agency that would even think twice about using known and effective tools to whip up some division and kick up some dust to help cover their activities?

And we’ve got FBI agents all up in arms and refusing to follow orders because, uh, they were only following orders before.

You can’t make this up.

My point here is, what are the chances that the tools of persuasion, used effectively and honed during covid, aren’t going to be deployed in their time of need by swampy creatures scrambling for their lives?

Conclusion

If an audit reveals that bot-farms have been inciting violence, those entities running them should be criminally charged with intentionally sowing the seeds of violence.

If those entities received funding from the US government, any and all government employees involved in that decision chain should be immediately fired and also charged.

This is serious business.

Someone is trying to get people killed or start an internal war and that’s not okay.

Watch the Video
For updates and info, contact scott at planttrees dot org.